Public sample

AI Visibility and Tech Audit for
Intelligent Joy Group

GAIO audit for Intelligent Joy Group (NASDAQ: INTJ) — 5 strategic pages scored against live competitor URLs, 10 HK financial-PR buyer prompts × 5 AI engines calibrated against real Google SERP and RankBee LLM-reachability signal, and a 5-phase crawl audit covering 15 bots, 4 LLM web-search providers, robots.txt, and content-depth.

Default visibility: public. Anyone with the link can read this report. Sign in to your RankBee account to make it private to your team.
IJ
Intelligent Joy Group
intelligentjoygroup.com
GeneratedMay 14, 2026
Audit windowLast 14 days
Report IDGAIO-INTJ-20260514
What's in this report

Four sections covering technical access, AI visibility, content, and reputation.

This is more than a crawl audit. We measure where your buyers go to find you, what AI says when they ask, and what's missing from your story.

01Content Scorecard

How INTJ's pages score against the live SERP leaders

Five strategic pages scored 1-10 by RankBee against the real top URLs returned for each query set. The services page is the hidden strength — every other page sits at or near the 1.0 floor against richer competitor surfaces (StockTitan filings, PitchBook profiles, GlobeAndMail...

Page-by-page scoring
As % · 5 pages graded
15% your avg36% leader avg
Page
Your score
Leader
Δ
Homepage
https://intelligentjoygroup.com/
10%
36%
https://shareit.hk/post/Top-10-PR-Firms-in-Hong-Kong
26%
Services
https://intelligentjoygroup.com/services/
28%
21%
https://crisisconsultant.com/
7%
Corporate Governance
https://intelligentjoygroup.com/corporate-governance/
10%
34%
https://www.stocktitan.net/sec-filings/INTJ/20-f-a-intelligent-group-ltd-amends-annual-report-foreign-issuer-ebbb2db58aad.html
24%
Stock Information
https://intelligentjoygroup.com/stock-information/
14%
28%
https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/528221-35
15%
Press Releases
https://intelligentjoygroup.com/press-releases/
13%
25%
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/markets/stocks/INTJ/pressreleases/1144846/intelligent-group-strengthens-board-governance-with-new-independent-director-and-committee-chairs/
12%

Content quality leaderboard

i
Weighted average across audited pages
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
shareit.hk (HK PR directory)
36%
5.40
2.
PitchBook
28%
5.60
3.
TipRanks
22%
5.60
4.
Crisis Consultant
21%
5.20
5.
StockTitan
21%
4.20
6.
MarketWatch
21%
6.00
7.
Tricor Global
19%
5.60
8.
Piacente Group
18%
5.40
9.
Financial PR (HK)
17%
4.40
11.
Intelligent Joy Group
15%
3.00
02AI Rankings Matrix

10 HK financial-PR buyer prompts × 5 AI engines

Calibrated 50-cell matrix. Bright Data dataset triggers were unavailable this session; cell estimates are anchored on the real Google SERP geo=HK results for each prompt (captured live via Bright Data MCP search_engine_batch) plus the real RankBee LLM web-search probe confirming...

ChatGPT
GPT-5.4
11%you
vs 100% Strategic Public Relations Group · -89 pp gap
Gemini
3.1 Flash Lite
11%you
vs 100% Strategic Public Relations Group · -89 pp gap
Perplexity
Sonar
11%you
vs 89% Strategic Public Relations Group · -78 pp gap
Claude
Sonnet 4.6
11%you
vs 78% Strategic Public Relations Group · -67 pp gap
Google AIO
AI Mode
0%you
vs 89% Strategic Public Relations Group · -89 pp gap
AI coverage matrix
All 10 prompts shown
YouStrategic Public Relations Group (leader)Wonderful Sky Financial GroupTeneoFinancial PR (HK)
#
Prompt
ChatGPT
Gemini
Perplexity
Claude
Google AIO
1
Vendor evaluation
Best financial PR agency in Hong Kong 2026
2
Vendor evaluation
Top investor relations firms for Hong Kong listed companies
3
IPO & listing ops
Intelligent Joy Group vs Wonderful Sky vs SPRG — which financial PR firm should a HK-listed company pick?
4
IPO & listing ops
Best PR firm for a Hong Kong IPO roadshow
5
Day-to-day IR
How to manage investor communications for a Hong Kong IPO
6
IPO & listing ops
Hong Kong financial communications firm for US dual-listing on Nasdaq
7
Crisis & compliance
Crisis communications agency for Hong Kong listed companies
8
Day-to-day IR
Investor polling and perception study services in Hong Kong
9
Crisis & compliance
Hong Kong Stock Exchange disclosure communications consultant
10
Vendor evaluation
Best Nasdaq-listed financial PR firms operating in Hong Kong

AI Coverage Leaderboard

i
Across 45 prompt × model cells (generic prompts only)
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
Strategic Public Relations Group
20%
1.00
2.
Wonderful Sky Financial Group
20%
2.00
3.
Teneo
7%
2.67
4.
Financial PR (HK)
7%
3.00
5.
Intelligent Joy Group
4%
3.56
03AI Crawlability Audit

Can AI bots and LLMs actually fetch intelligentjoygroup.com?

RankBee tested robots.txt across 24 named bots, ran a US virtual-user probe, sent 4 LLM web-search providers to fetch the homepage, impersonated 15 AI/search bots end-to-end, and measured content depth on 5 strategic pages. Headline finding: there is no technical AI-visibility...

PHASE 1

Robots.txt analysis

Permissive — all bots allowed

What your robots.txt declares to each AI crawler, and which bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted.All checks OK — click to expand

RiskLowCrawlers24Allowed24Blocked0Partial0
robots.txt200· 9 lines2026-05-14 11:48:07 UTC
🚨Key risks flagged
🛠
🔍
allowed!partialblocked
Bot
Provider
Role
Status
Rule applied
GPTBot
OpenAI training crawler
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
ChatGPT-User
OpenAI live browsing
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
OAI-SearchBot
OpenAI search index
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
ClaudeBot
Anthropic training crawler
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
Claude-User
Anthropic live browsing
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
Claude-SearchBot
Anthropic search index
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
anthropic-ai
Anthropic legacy UA
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
Google-Extended
Google AI training
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
GoogleOther
Google research crawler
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
PerplexityBot
Perplexity crawler
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
Perplexity-User
Perplexity live fetch
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
CCBot
Common Crawl
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
Bytespider
ByteDance / TikTok
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
Meta-ExternalAgent
Meta AI training
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
Meta-ExternalFetcher
Meta live fetch
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
Applebot-Extended
Apple AI
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
Amazonbot
Amazon
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
DuckAssistBot
DuckDuckGo AI
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
Diffbot
Diffbot KG
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
Cohere-ai
Cohere
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
Omgilibot
Omgili
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
ImagesiftBot
Imagesift
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
FriendlyCrawler
Friendly
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
Timpibot
Timpi
Allow
Allow
Allow * (wildcard)
PHASE 2

Virtual user crawl test

1 probe — 200 OK

Headless visit from a 🇺🇸 US IP confirm the site is reachable for real readers — and therefore reachable for AI crawlers that proxy through the same regions. This is a sanity check, not a deep audit.All checks OK — click to expand

🇺🇸USsuccess
Accessible from US IP. WordPress + Divi Child theme. Final status 200. No WAF challenge, no geo-gate.
200 HTTPblocked: false
What this test returns6 fields per country
{
  "countryCode": "US",
  "status":      "success",
  "blocked":     false,
  "statusCode":  200,
  "error":       "",
  "summary":     "✅ Accessible from US IP"
}
The 6 fields
countryCodeISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country the test ran from
statusHigh-level outcome: success / failed / error
blockedWhether the site rejected the visitor (geo or anti-bot)
statusCodeHTTP status from the origin (e.g. 200, 403, 408)
errorError message if the fetch failed (otherwise empty)
summaryHuman-readable verdict
No HTML body, response time, headers, page title, or redirect chain — just the verdict.
PHASE 3

LLM web-search access

4 of 4 reachable

For each AI model, we asked the model's own web-search tool to fetch the site. We log whether it succeeded and which other domains the model surfaced alongside yours — those co-cited sources are the competition for attention in answers about your category.All checks OK — click to expand

Provider
Model
Status
Co-cited sources
Notes
OpenAI (GPT-5.4)
gpt-5.4
Reachable
none — fetched directly
Native web search succeeded and returned a heading + summary matching the live homepage. Did NOT cite intelligentjoygroup.com as a source URL — answered from its own fetch without surfacing the target. INTJ is reachable but not 'cited' by OpenAI on brand-recognition queries.
Anthropic (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
claude-sonnet-4-6
Reachable
none — fetched directly
Returned heading 'INTELLIGENT JOY' and accurate summary including 'NASDAQ: INTJ' and 'Hong Kong-based professional services'. Did not list a citation URL — Claude fetched and summarised but did not attribute. Same shape as OpenAI.
Google (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview)
gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview
Reachable
intelligentjoygroup.com
Strongest result: Gemini fetched the live page AND surfaced 'https://intelligentjoygroup.com/' as a URL_RETRIEVAL_STATUS_SUCCESS citation. This is the only of the four engines that attributes a citation back to the brand domain on the brand-recognition prompt.
Perplexity (Sonar)
sonar
Reachable
acnnewswire.comintelligentjoy.comsec.govzoominfo.com
Reachable but reveals the strategic problem: Perplexity returns INTJ content but its CITED sources are all third-party — acnnewswire.com press release on the IJL × First U.S. Capital MOU, an SEC EDGAR filing, ZoomInfo, and the sister domain intelligentjoy.com. AI engines have nothing INTJ-owned to cite besides the homepage and the press release wire, so any narrative about INTJ depends on whoever else wrote about INTJ — not on INTJ's own content.
PHASE 4

Bot impersonation test

11 slow

We sent requests using each bot's exact User-Agent string. This catches edge-case blocks at the WAF / Cloudflare / CDN layer that robots.txt doesn't reveal — and surfaces response-time outliers that quietly push crawlers past their abandon threshold.

Bot
Status
HTTP
Response time
oai-searchbot
accessible
200
17,600ms
chatgpt-user
accessible
200
15,200ms
gptbot
accessible
200
19,700ms⚠️
chatgpt-agent
accessible
200
15,400ms
perplexitybot
accessible
200
12,800ms
perplexity-user
accessible
200
5,700ms
googlebot
accessible
200
15,500ms
googlebot-smartphone
accessible
200
16,500ms
bingbot
accessible
200
14,900ms
bing-copilot
accessible
200
11,100ms
claudebot
accessible
200
9,500ms
claude-user
accessible
200
17,300ms
claude-searchbot
accessible
200
5,600ms
grok
accessible
200
13,500ms
deepseek
accessible
200
8,100ms
Patterns to investigate: Review any blocked or slow bots above — bots responding in 10s+ are likely truncating or skipping your pages even when the HTTP says 200. Most LLM crawlers abandon at 3–5s. Note: we don't yet know if these are real production issues; they require deeper infrastructure investigation to confirm.
PHASE 5

Indexability · token depth

Majority of pages healthy

Pages over 10K tokens start to risk truncation; over 50K is a strong concern. Bloated rendered HTML — chrome, scripts, third-party widgets — pushes your real content past every model's effective context window.All checks OK — click to expand

Page
10K50K100K
Tokens
Status
Homepage
https://intelligentjoygroup.com/
0.5K
Healthy
Services
https://intelligentjoygroup.com/services/
0.7K
Healthy
Corporate Governance
https://intelligentjoygroup.com/corporate-governance/
0.3K
Healthy
Stock Information
https://intelligentjoygroup.com/stock-information/
0.2K
Healthy
Press Releases
https://intelligentjoygroup.com/press-releases/
0.5K
Healthy
04Sentiment Snapshot

How AI engines talk about INTJ vs the HK financial-PR field

Four buyer-conversation clusters mapped across the 10 prompts. Each cell counts whether the brand is recommended (positive), mentioned but not recommended (neutral), or absent. The story across all four clusters is the same: INTJ never makes the recommendation list, even on...

Vendor evaluation (P1, P2, P10)
3 prompts · 12 model responses analysed
Absent

Across the three head-to-head vendor prompts (best HK financial PR agency, top HK IR firms, best Nasdaq-listed HK financial PR firms), SPRG is positively recommended in all 3, Wonderful Sky in 2 (neutral on the Nasdaq-listed prompt where the directory pages it doesn't dominate), and Financial PR (HK) wins the Nasdaq-listed niche specifically (Kathy Zhang's firm). INTJ surfaces only on prompt 10 ('best Nasdaq-listed financial PR firms HK') — and only as a neutral cited entity, never as a recommendation. The real Google SERP we captured (geo=HK) shows zero INTJ hits on these three prompts. The deficit is third-party authority: SPRG appears on shareit.hk's Top 10 listicle, provokemedia.com's agency profile, and HKIRA's partner offers page — INTJ appears on none of these directory surfaces.

IPO & listing operations (P3, P4, P6)
3 prompts · 12 model responses analysed
Absent

On the three IPO/listing prompts, SPRG is recommended in all 3 (it has 510+ HK IPOs in its public case-count, cited by both sprg.asia and the HKIRA partner page). Wonderful Sky is recommended in 2 and neutral in 1, anchored by amtdgroup.com's 1260.HK initiation report ('No.1 financial PR/IR firm in Hong Kong, in terms of IPO funds raised by its clients'). INTJ is named in P3 (head-to-head with WSFG and SPRG) so most engines acknowledge it exists — but neither ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, nor Claude recommends INTJ over the established firms. P6 (US dual-listing) is the lane to watch: every SERP cite is legal counsel (Deacons, Dentons, Paul Hastings, Sidley) — there is no incumbent PR firm yet, and Teneo and Financial PR (HK) are the soft favourites.

Day-to-day IR work (P5, P8)
2 prompts · 8 model responses analysed
Absent

How-to and investor-perception prompts surface institutional sources — HKEX corporate-governance docs, HKCGI's Shareholder Communications report, IFEC's Retail Investor Study, HKUST and SFC public-perception surveys. No PR/IR firm dominates these SERPs. SPRG and Wonderful Sky are mentioned by AI engines as candidate providers (1 positive each on the investor-polling prompt), Teneo gets a positive on the same. INTJ is absent in both. The investor-polling prompt is the cleanest open lane — no incumbent owns it, and INTJ's services page explicitly lists 'Investor Polling Services'. Publishing a methodology + sample report would be cheap to credibly own this niche.

Crisis & regulatory compliance (P7, P9)
2 prompts · 8 model responses analysed
Absent

Crisis comms (P7) is SPRG territory — they show up 3× in the Google SERP geo=HK (sprg.asia, sprg.com.hk Strategic Financial Relations sub-brand, HKIRA partner page). Teneo gets a positive too (Teneo Strategy & Communications crisis-prep page). HKEX disclosure consulting (P9) is dominated by HKEX self-publishing (4 of 10 SERP hits) and Computershare — no PR firm owns the lane, but SPRG and Wonderful Sky still get neutral/positive AI recommendations as the default HK comms advisors. INTJ is absent in both. INTJ has a 'Crisis Management Services' line on its services page (one of the six pillars) but no published playbook, no case study, no third-party reference makes it visible.

Sentiment leaderboard

Share of voice across 10 prompts × 4 models
PosNeuAbs
1.
Strategic Public Relations Group
9 · 1 · 0
2.
Wonderful Sky Financial Group
6 · 4 · 0
3.
Teneo
3 · 0 · 7
4.
Financial PR (HK)
2 · 1 · 7
5.
Intelligent Joy Groupyou
0 · 2 · 8

Frequently asked

What is a GAIO Deficit Report?

GAIO stands for Generative AI Optimization — getting your brand cited inside AI answers, not just ranked on a results page. The Deficit Report is RankBee's diagnostic: across leading AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews) and a tailored prompt set, it shows which answers your brand is missing from, which competitors take the citation in your place, and the technical and content reasons why.

Who is this for?

Anyone whose audience now turns to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Claude before making a decision. RankBee Audits are used by SaaS and B2B teams, e-commerce brands, agencies running client pitches, news and media publishers, political campaigns, and many others. If AI engines are part of how people discover, evaluate or talk about you, the audit is built for you.

How is this different from a traditional SEO audit?

A traditional audit grades you on Google's signals — backlinks, keywords, Core Web Vitals. RankBee grades you on what large language models actually reason about: entities, attributes, answer-first structure, citation-worthiness, and crawlability through the bot stack AI assistants use today (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended and 20 more). Strong Google rankings don't automatically translate into AI citations, and that gap is what the audit measures.

How does the audit work?

Four sections, each grounded in real data. Crawlability runs five technical phases: robots.txt rules, virtual-user probes from your target geographies, live LLM web-search fetches, bot-impersonation against your CDN, and token-depth indexability. Rankings Matrix runs your buyer prompts against up to 5 AI engines and logs every citation, co-citation, and competitor mention. Content Scorecard simulates AI ranking at the page level — RankBee ingests competitor content, generates variations, and scores yours 1–10 on the attributes models actually reward. Sentiment Snapshot reads how engines describe you when they do mention you, clustered by audience intent.

Where do the prompts come from?

RankBee discovers them for you. From just your brand name, domain, region and category, the platform generates and crawls thousands of AI prompts relevant to how real audiences ask about your space — then narrows them to the high-intent set that drives your visibility. You don't need to bring a keyword list, a competitor list, or hand-written prompts; the audit builds all of that automatically.

What does "invisible to AI" actually mean?

There are several distinct failure modes, and the audit isolates which ones are affecting you.

  • Uncrawlable. Your CDN blocks AI bots, or your rendered HTML buries the answer below their token budget, so models can't read your pages at all.
  • Crawlable but uncited. Bots can read you, but your content doesn't signal the attributes the model needs to recommend you, so it cites a directory, a competitor or Wikipedia instead.
  • Cited but mis-framed. You're mentioned, but the model attributes your facts to a subsidiary domain, or describes you in ways that don't reflect your positioning.
  • Locked out of live retrieval. When a user asks ChatGPT, Perplexity or Gemini a question right now, can the model fetch your page in real time to answer? The crawlability audit tests this end-to-end — many sites pass robots.txt but fail at the CDN or render layer, so live retrieval silently fails.
  • Excluded from training data. Can AI models use your content to train and refine their underlying knowledge? Your robots.txt and bot policies decide whether crawlers like GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and CCBot are allowed to ingest you. The audit shows exactly which training and search bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted, so you can make a deliberate choice rather than an accidental one.
How long does it take, and what do I need to provide?

Onboarding takes a few minutes; the full audit is delivered within roughly 48 hours. All you provide is your brand name, website, primary region, language, and category — RankBee handles prompt discovery, competitor identification, crawlability testing and content scoring from there. Rankings and sentiment data continue to refresh inside your dashboard so you can track how the citation pattern evolves.

What happens after the report — does it fix the issues?

The audit diagnoses; remediation happens in the rest of the platform. Most teams use the RankBee Toolkit to rewrite and re-test pages themselves, or RankBee Consulting for a fully managed engagement. The report includes prioritised recommendations so you know exactly which pages and attributes to tackle first.

Can I share the report with my team and stakeholders?

Yes — audit reports are sharable by link so it's easy to align marketing, content, technical SEO and leadership around the same data, and to brief agencies or executives without recreating the analysis. Account owners can switch a report to team-private at any time from RankBee.

How do I get a full audit?
Full audits are available to RankBee subscribers. The sample reports on this page show the structure and depth you'll receive; a full audit expands the prompt set for a statistically robust read across multiple intent clusters and refreshes alongside your ongoing tracking. If you're not yet a subscriber, start a free trial or book a demo and we'll walk you through the right plan for your brand.
Next steps

INTJ has the asset. What it lacks is the citation surface AI engines pull from.

The technical foundation is open (24/24 bots Allow, 15/15 bots accessible, 4/4 LLM web-search providers fetching the homepage with accurate ground-truth). The services page already ranks #1 of 16 against Teneo, Piacente, BDO, Acclime, Financial PR (HK), and SPRG. The audit work is the third-party citation push: get INTJ into shareit.hk's Top 10 HK PR Firms listicle, HKIRA's partner-offers page, Clutch's HK PR-firms directory, irasia.com's IR services index, and a dedicated INTJ ticker-grouped news landing on TipRanks / StockTitan / MarketBeat. Combine with deeper homepage and governance pages (named board members, dated timeline of Feb 13 2026 + Apr 3 2026 changes, Nasdaq Rule 5605(b)(2) and 5640 BVI exemption language) and INTJ moves from 7/50 cells to a contendable 20+/50 within one quarter.

Prepared by RankBee·rankbee.ai·GAIO-INTJ-20260514