Public sample

AI Visibility and Tech Audit for
Chaince Digital

GAIO audit for Chaince Digital Holdings (Nasdaq: CD) — 5 pages content-scored against the live competitive web via RankBee, 15 bots impersonated, 4 LLM web-search probes, and a 50-cell ranking matrix run live across 10 buyer prompts × 5 AI engines (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude).

Default visibility: public. Anyone with the link can read this report. Sign in to your RankBee account to make it private to your team.
CD
Chaince Digital
chaincedigital.com
GeneratedMay 14, 2026
Audit windowLast 14 days
Report IDGAIO-CD-2026-05-14
What's in this report

Four sections covering technical access, AI visibility, content, and reputation.

This is more than a crawl audit. We measure where your buyers go to find you, what AI says when they ask, and what's missing from your story.

01Content Scorecard

Content scorecard vs. live AI citations

Each Chaince Digital page scored against the URLs AI engines actually cite when answering buyer queries in that category. Raw 1-10 scores from RankBee Content API; rank is against the real live competitor set, not a fixed peer list.

Page-by-page scoring
As % · 5 pages graded
11% your avg30% leader avg
Page
Your score
Leader
Δ
Homepage
https://chaincedigital.com/
10%
15%
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/tokenizing-ai-infrastructure-data-centers-unlocking-new-garima-singh-xhizf
5%
AI & HPC
https://chaincedigital.com/ai-hpc/
10%
16%
https://www.supermicro.com/en/solutions/ai-deep-learning
6%
Blockchain & Digital Assets
https://chaincedigital.com/blockchain-digital-asset-solutions/
13%
14%
https://chain.link/article/digital-assets-custody
1%
Company
https://chaincedigital.com/company/
10%
16%
https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/aiai-holdings-corporation-announces-approval-123000481.html
6%
Leadership
https://chaincedigital.com/leadership/
10%
13%
https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/software/nasdaq-cd/chaince-digital-holdings/management
3%

Content quality leaderboard

i
Weighted average across audited pages
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
Chainlink
30%
9.60
2.
Simply Wall St
29%
9.80
3.
QuickNode
25%
9.80
4.
Supermicro
22%
9.60
5.
Yahoo Finance
20%
8.00
6.
Equinix
20%
9.80
7.
Medium
19%
10.00
8.
Aligned DC
18%
10.00
9.
Finextra
18%
10.20
32.
Chaince Digital
11%
8.20
02AI Rankings Matrix

Ranking matrix across AI engines

10 buyer prompts × 5 AI engines = 50 chances to surface. Cells show how many of the five engines (ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude) mentioned each brand for that prompt — captured live via Bright Data datasets and the Anthropic API on May 14, 2026.

ChatGPT
GPT-5.4
0%you
vs 14% Iris Energy (IREN) · -14 pp gap
Gemini
3.1 Flash
0%you
vs 14% Iris Energy (IREN) · -14 pp gap
Perplexity
Sonar
0%you
vs 14% Iris Energy (IREN) · -14 pp gap
Claude
Sonnet 4.6
0%you
vs 14% Iris Energy (IREN) · -14 pp gap
AI Overviews
Google AIO
0%you
vs 29% Iris Energy (IREN) · -29 pp gap
AI coverage matrix
All 10 prompts shown
YouIris Energy (IREN) (leader)Galaxy DigitalApplied DigitalHut 8
#
Prompt
ChatGPT
Gemini
Perplexity
Claude
AI Overviews
1
Vendor evaluation
Which Nasdaq-listed companies offer diversified AI/HPC infrastructure plus blockchain and digital asset services?
2
Vendor evaluation
Compare Chaince Digital vs Galaxy Digital vs Hut 8 for institutional digital asset infrastructure.
3
Vendor evaluation
What are the best AI compute providers that also offer blockchain infrastructure for institutional investors?
4
Operational & risk
What are the operational risks of using a publicly listed digital asset and AI infrastructure holding company for tokenization services?
5
Operational & risk
How do liquid cooling joint ventures like Chaince and ZJK's Afinity Base compete with hyperscaler AI data centers?
6
Operational & risk
Which providers offer enterprise-grade tokenization of real world assets for institutional investors in the US?
7
Compliance & regulatory
Which FINRA-registered broker-dealers also offer blockchain and digital asset infrastructure to institutional clients?
8
Compliance & regulatory
What are the SEC compliance considerations for a Nasdaq-listed company combining AI infrastructure and digital asset services?
9
Infrastructure & setup
How does Chaince Digital Holdings (formerly Mercurity Fintech) structure its AI, blockchain, and financial services subsidiaries?
10
Infrastructure & setup
What infrastructure partners and data center facilities support institutional blockchain and AI compute providers in the United States?

AI Coverage Leaderboard

i
Across 35 prompt × model cells (generic prompts only)
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
Iris Energy (IREN)
9%
1.14
2.
Galaxy Digital
9%
1.57
3.
Applied Digital
6%
1.29
4.
Hut 8
6%
1.86
5.
Bit Digital
3%
2.00
6.
Chaince Digital
0%
03AI Crawlability Audit

Crawl & indexability

What an AI crawler — robot, virtual user, and live LLM browser — actually sees when it tries to read chaincedigital.com.

PHASE 1

Robots.txt analysis

Permissive — all bots allowed

What your robots.txt declares to each AI crawler, and which bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted.All checks OK — click to expand

RiskLowCrawlers18Allowed18Blocked0Partial0
robots.txt200· 6 lines2026-05-14T11:46:21.924Z
🚨Key risks flagged
🛠
🔍
allowed!partialblocked
Bot
Provider
Role
Status
Rule applied
GPTBot
OpenAI
training
Allow
Allow
ChatGPT-User
OpenAI
live answers
Allow
Allow
OAI-SearchBot
OpenAI
search index
Allow
Allow
ClaudeBot
Anthropic
training
Allow
Allow
Claude-User
Anthropic
live answers
Allow
Allow
Claude-SearchBot
Anthropic
search index
Allow
Allow
anthropic-ai
Anthropic
legacy
Allow
Allow
Google-Extended
Google
Gemini training
Allow
Allow
GoogleOther
Google
auxiliary fetch
Allow
Allow
PerplexityBot
Perplexity
training
Allow
Allow
Perplexity-User
Perplexity
live answers
Allow
Allow
CCBot
Common Crawl
training corpus
Allow
Allow
Bytespider
ByteDance
training
Allow
Allow
Meta-ExternalAgent
Meta
live answers
Allow
Allow
Applebot-Extended
Apple
training
Allow
Allow
Amazonbot
Amazon
training
Allow
Allow
DuckAssistBot
DuckDuckGo
live answers
Allow
Allow
Cohere-ai
Cohere
training
Allow
Allow
PHASE 2

Virtual user crawl test

1 probe — 200 OK

Headless visit from a 🇺🇸 US IP confirm the site is reachable for real readers — and therefore reachable for AI crawlers that proxy through the same regions. This is a sanity check, not a deep audit.All checks OK — click to expand

🇺🇸USsuccess
Accessible from a US virtual user — 200 OK, page renders normally. Primary buyer market is reachable without geofencing.
200 HTTPblocked: false
What this test returns6 fields per country
{
  "countryCode": "US",
  "status":      "success",
  "blocked":     false,
  "statusCode":  200,
  "error":       "",
  "summary":     "✅ Accessible from US IP"
}
The 6 fields
countryCodeISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country the test ran from
statusHigh-level outcome: success / failed / error
blockedWhether the site rejected the visitor (geo or anti-bot)
statusCodeHTTP status from the origin (e.g. 200, 403, 408)
errorError message if the fetch failed (otherwise empty)
summaryHuman-readable verdict
No HTML body, response time, headers, page title, or redirect chain — just the verdict.
PHASE 3

LLM web-search access

4 of 4 reachable

For each AI model, we asked the model's own web-search tool to fetch the site. We log whether it succeeded and which other domains the model surfaced alongside yours — those co-cited sources are the competition for attention in answers about your category.All checks OK — click to expand

Provider
Model
Status
Co-cited sources
Notes
OpenAI (gpt-5.4)
gpt-5.4
Reachable
none — fetched directly
Phase 4 probe: fetched the homepage and returned an accurate heading + summary. In the live 50-cell self-retrieval, ChatGPT cited chaincedigital.com on 3 of the 10 prompts (P2, P5, P9 — all explicit-name) and co-cited SEC filings, Yahoo Finance, Nasdaq, and Reuters when describing the company. WAF accepts oai-searchbot at 200 (12.1s).
Anthropic (claude-sonnet-4-6)
claude-sonnet-4-6
Reachable
none — fetched directly
Phase 4 probe: fetched the homepage and returned an accurate summary. In the live 50-cell run, Claude (sonnet-4-5 with web_search_20250305) cited chaincedigital.com on the explicit-name prompts and reached for SEC.gov, finance.yahoo.com, nasdaq.com, and stocktitan.net on the others. claudebot, claude-user, claude-searchbot all WAF-accessible (all 200, 11-16s).
Gemini (gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview)
gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview
Reachable
chaincedigital.com
Phase 4 probe: fetched the homepage and explicitly cited chaincedigital.com (URL_RETRIEVAL_STATUS_SUCCESS). In the live 50-cell run, Gemini cited owned content on P2/P5/P9 and reached for nasdaq.com, jpmorgan.com, finra.org, and natlawreview.com on compliance/regulatory questions — none of which include chaincedigital.com.
Perplexity (sonar)
sonar
Reachable
chaincedigital.comchaincedigital.com/contactchaincedigital.com/blockchain-digital-asset-solutionschaincedigital.com/leadershipchaincedigital.com/corporate-newschaincedigital.com/sec-filingschaincedigital.com/press-releaseschaincedigital.com/business-segments
Strongest engagement — Perplexity returned an accurate summary AND cited 10 distinct chaincedigital.com URLs spanning contact, blockchain solutions, leadership, corporate news, SEC filings, press releases, business segments, and a sponsorship post. When an engine is allowed to browse freely, the brand's own site IS surfaceable.
PHASE 4

Bot impersonation test

1 inaccessible · 13 slow

We sent requests using each bot's exact User-Agent string. This catches edge-case blocks at the WAF / Cloudflare / CDN layer that robots.txt doesn't reveal — and surfaces response-time outliers that quietly push crawlers past their abandon threshold.

Bot
Status
HTTP
Response time
oai-searchbot
accessible
200
12,100ms
chatgpt-user
accessible
200
17,600ms⚠️
gptbot
accessible
200
31,800ms⚠️
chatgpt-agent
accessible
200
10,900ms
perplexitybot
accessible
200
7,400ms
perplexity-user
accessible
200
17,400ms⚠️
googlebot
accessible
200
12,400ms
googlebot-smartphone
accessible
200
11,600ms
bingbot
accessible
200
17,900ms⚠️
bing-copilot
accessible
200
16,400ms⚠️
claudebot
accessible
200
11,900ms
claude-user
accessible
200
14,900ms
claude-searchbot
accessible
200
15,600ms⚠️
grok
blocked
408
40,000ms (timeout)
deepseek
accessible
200
13,600ms
Patterns to investigate: Review any blocked or slow bots above — bots responding in 10s+ are likely truncating or skipping your pages even when the HTTP says 200. Most LLM crawlers abandon at 3–5s. Note: we don't yet know if these are real production issues; they require deeper infrastructure investigation to confirm.
PHASE 5

Indexability · token depth

Majority of pages healthy

Pages over 10K tokens start to risk truncation; over 50K is a strong concern. Bloated rendered HTML — chrome, scripts, third-party widgets — pushes your real content past every model's effective context window.All checks OK — click to expand

Page
10K50K100K
Tokens
Status
Homepage
https://chaincedigital.com/
1.4K
Healthy
AI & HPC
https://chaincedigital.com/ai-hpc/
1.1K
Healthy
Blockchain & Digital Assets
https://chaincedigital.com/blockchain-digital-asset-solutions/
1.9K
Healthy
Company
https://chaincedigital.com/company/
0.9K
Healthy
Leadership
https://chaincedigital.com/leadership/
0.7K
Healthy
04Sentiment Snapshot

Sentiment by buyer-conversation cluster

How AI assistants frame Chaince Digital across four buyer clusters. Per-cluster counts are positive (recommended by ≥1 engine) / neutral (mentioned but not recommended) / absent (no engine named the brand). Citations from the 50-cell run rank chaincedigital.com 2nd most-cited...

Operational & risk (3 prompts)
3 prompts · 12 model responses analysed
Absent

Two of the three prompts (P4 operational risks, P6 RWA tokenization providers) yielded zero brand mentions from any engine — they get answered in abstract terms (regulatory, custody, governance) without naming specific public companies. Chaince's one positive (P5) is the ZJK / Afinity Base liquid-cooling JV: 4 of 5 engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude — AIO missed) correctly identified Chaince as competing with hyperscaler AI data centers via specialised cooling. The RWA tokenization prompt cites Securitize, Tokeny, Fireblocks, Polymath instead of any of the six diversified peers — none of them are positioned as tokenization platforms in AI's index.

Compliance & regulatory (2 prompts)
2 prompts · 8 model responses analysed
Absent

Both compliance prompts (P7 FINRA-registered broker-dealers with blockchain, P8 SEC compliance for Nasdaq AI/digital-asset hybrids) returned zero positive mentions for any of the six peers. AI engines answer these in regulatory-framework abstraction — citing finra.org, sec.gov, jpmorgan.com, natlawreview.com — and reach for Prometheum as the specific named FINRA-blockchain example, not Chaince Securities. The Wilfred Daye CSO / Chaince Securities CEO story exists on chaincedigital.com but isn't structured in a way that turns up in 'Which FINRA broker-dealers also offer blockchain infrastructure?' answers. Strongest content-gap opportunity.

Vendor evaluation (3 prompts)
3 prompts · 12 model responses analysed
Neutral

Chaince surfaces 1 of 3 prompts (P2 — the explicit 'Chaince vs Galaxy vs Hut 8' comparison, where all 5 engines correctly described the tri-segment structure). On P1 ('which Nasdaq-listed companies offer diversified AI/HPC + blockchain + digital assets') and P3 ('best AI compute providers that also offer blockchain') Chaince is absent across all 5 engines. Galaxy Digital wins all 3 (positive in 3/3 prompts), followed by Iris Energy (2/3) and Hut 8 (2/3). Engines reach for galaxy.com (22 citations), investor.galaxy.com (17), and hut8.com (15) when building their vendor lists from scratch — the multi-year brand awareness Chaince doesn't yet have post-rebrand.

Infrastructure & setup (2 prompts)
2 prompts · 8 model responses analysed
Neutral

P9 'how does Chaince Digital Holdings structure its AI, blockchain, and financial services subsidiaries' — all 5 engines correctly described the tri-segment structure (positive 5/5), and chaincedigital.com is the most-cited domain in this prompt's answers. P10 'US data centers and infrastructure partners for blockchain and AI compute' is the structural gap: Chaince absent across all 5 engines while Hut 8 (2/5), Applied (2/5), and Iren (2/5) all surface as data-center operators with named footprints. Chaince has a precision-components partnership, not a data-center operator narrative AI engines can reuse.

Sentiment leaderboard

Share of voice across 10 prompts × 4 models
PosNeuAbs
1.
Galaxy Digital
4 · 0 · 6
2.
Chaince Digitalyou
3 · 0 · 7
3.
Hut 8
3 · 0 · 7
4.
Iris Energy (IREN)
3 · 0 · 7
5.
Applied Digital
2 · 0 · 8
6.
Bit Digital
1 · 0 · 9

Frequently asked

What is a GAIO Deficit Report?

GAIO stands for Generative AI Optimization — getting your brand cited inside AI answers, not just ranked on a results page. The Deficit Report is RankBee's diagnostic: across leading AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews) and a tailored prompt set, it shows which answers your brand is missing from, which competitors take the citation in your place, and the technical and content reasons why.

Who is this for?

Anyone whose audience now turns to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Claude before making a decision. RankBee Audits are used by SaaS and B2B teams, e-commerce brands, agencies running client pitches, news and media publishers, political campaigns, and many others. If AI engines are part of how people discover, evaluate or talk about you, the audit is built for you.

How is this different from a traditional SEO audit?

A traditional audit grades you on Google's signals — backlinks, keywords, Core Web Vitals. RankBee grades you on what large language models actually reason about: entities, attributes, answer-first structure, citation-worthiness, and crawlability through the bot stack AI assistants use today (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended and 20 more). Strong Google rankings don't automatically translate into AI citations, and that gap is what the audit measures.

How does the audit work?

Four sections, each grounded in real data. Crawlability runs five technical phases: robots.txt rules, virtual-user probes from your target geographies, live LLM web-search fetches, bot-impersonation against your CDN, and token-depth indexability. Rankings Matrix runs your buyer prompts against up to 5 AI engines and logs every citation, co-citation, and competitor mention. Content Scorecard simulates AI ranking at the page level — RankBee ingests competitor content, generates variations, and scores yours 1–10 on the attributes models actually reward. Sentiment Snapshot reads how engines describe you when they do mention you, clustered by audience intent.

Where do the prompts come from?

RankBee discovers them for you. From just your brand name, domain, region and category, the platform generates and crawls thousands of AI prompts relevant to how real audiences ask about your space — then narrows them to the high-intent set that drives your visibility. You don't need to bring a keyword list, a competitor list, or hand-written prompts; the audit builds all of that automatically.

What does "invisible to AI" actually mean?

There are several distinct failure modes, and the audit isolates which ones are affecting you.

  • Uncrawlable. Your CDN blocks AI bots, or your rendered HTML buries the answer below their token budget, so models can't read your pages at all.
  • Crawlable but uncited. Bots can read you, but your content doesn't signal the attributes the model needs to recommend you, so it cites a directory, a competitor or Wikipedia instead.
  • Cited but mis-framed. You're mentioned, but the model attributes your facts to a subsidiary domain, or describes you in ways that don't reflect your positioning.
  • Locked out of live retrieval. When a user asks ChatGPT, Perplexity or Gemini a question right now, can the model fetch your page in real time to answer? The crawlability audit tests this end-to-end — many sites pass robots.txt but fail at the CDN or render layer, so live retrieval silently fails.
  • Excluded from training data. Can AI models use your content to train and refine their underlying knowledge? Your robots.txt and bot policies decide whether crawlers like GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and CCBot are allowed to ingest you. The audit shows exactly which training and search bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted, so you can make a deliberate choice rather than an accidental one.
How long does it take, and what do I need to provide?

Onboarding takes a few minutes; the full audit is delivered within roughly 48 hours. All you provide is your brand name, website, primary region, language, and category — RankBee handles prompt discovery, competitor identification, crawlability testing and content scoring from there. Rankings and sentiment data continue to refresh inside your dashboard so you can track how the citation pattern evolves.

What happens after the report — does it fix the issues?

The audit diagnoses; remediation happens in the rest of the platform. Most teams use the RankBee Toolkit to rewrite and re-test pages themselves, or RankBee Consulting for a fully managed engagement. The report includes prioritised recommendations so you know exactly which pages and attributes to tackle first.

Can I share the report with my team and stakeholders?

Yes — audit reports are sharable by link so it's easy to align marketing, content, technical SEO and leadership around the same data, and to brief agencies or executives without recreating the analysis. Account owners can switch a report to team-private at any time from RankBee.

How do I get a full audit?
Full audits are available to RankBee subscribers. The sample reports on this page show the structure and depth you'll receive; a full audit expands the prompt set for a statistically robust read across multiple intent clusters and refreshes alongside your ongoing tracking. If you're not yet a subscriber, start a free trial or book a demo and we'll walk you through the right plan for your brand.
Next step

Get into the unprompted vendor list

Chaince Digital is the most-cited brand domain in the 50-cell run (39 citations) and dominates when prompts explicitly name it — every engine fetches chaincedigital.com and describes the tri-segment structure correctly. The gap is the 7 generic-category prompts where Chaince is absent across all 5 engines. Build the pages AI engines need to surface the brand unprompted: a 'Top diversified Nasdaq AI/HPC + blockchain companies' explainer that names Chaince alongside Galaxy / Hut 8 / Applied / Iren; a FINRA-registered-broker-dealer-with-blockchain landing page that competes with Prometheum's category claim; and a US data-center footprint narrative for /ai-hpc/ that gives engines a comparable story to Hut 8's and Applied Digital's named sites.

Prepared by RankBee·rankbee.ai·GAIO-CD-2026-05-14