Public sample

AI Visibility and Tech Audit for
Alpha Bank

How Greek retail customers, business owners, and investors find you — and don't — across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude. Audited across 10 buyer prompts, 4 AI engines, and 5 site pages. Looking at your Crawlability, Content Optimization, Sentiment, and Rankings.

Default visibility: public. Anyone with the link can read this report. Sign in to your RankBee account to make it private to your team.
AB
Alpha Bank
alpha.gr
GeneratedApril 27, 2026
Audit windowLast 14 days
Report IDRB-2026-04-AB-0427
What's in this report

Four sections covering technical access, AI visibility, content, and reputation.

This is more than a crawl audit. We measure where your buyers go to find you, what AI says when they ask, and what's missing from your story.

01Content Scorecard

Content quality: How well does your content perform vs the competition?

We run a simulation: RankBee crawls each of your pages and scores it 1–10 against your competitors. We don't just guess if what you've written could score high. We simulate it and we KNOW, which content is best placed to rank higher, as well as what changes you need to make to...

Page-by-page scoring
As % · 5 pages graded
16% your avg27% leader avg
Page
Your score
Leader
Δ
Homepage
/
12%
22%
https://www.capital.gr/epixeiriseis/3961147/i-peiraios-kaluteri-trapeza-stin-ellada-sta-bank-of-the-year-awards-2025-apo-to-the-banker/
10%
Mortgages — Στεγαστικά Δάνεια (Σπίτι μου ΙΙ)
/el/idiotes/daneia/stegastika-daneia
10%
33%
https://www.nbg.gr/el/idiwtes/daneia/stegastika-daneia/spiti-mou-ii-kratiko-programma-stegasis
23%
Business Banking — ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΣΕΙΣ
/el/Business
10%
25%
https://www.thetotalbusiness.com/2024/09/08/o-chartis-ton-ellinikon-trapezon-poia-einai-i-megalyteri-trapeza-stin-ellada/
15%
Investor Relations — Ενημέρωση Επενδύτων
/el/omilos/enimerosi-ependuton
16%
25%
https://www.alpha.gr/el/omilos/arxeio-alpha-services-and-holdings/arxeio-enimerosis-ependuton/oikonomika-stoixeia-arxeio-alpha-services-and-holdings/Economic-Analysis-Bank
10%
Press Releases — Δελτία Τύπου
/el/omilos/Grafeio-Typou/Press-Releases
32%
10%
https://www.alpha.gr/el/omilos/Grafeio-Typou/Press-Releases (you lead — rank 1 of 15)
22%

Content quality leaderboard

i
Weighted average across audited pages
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
nbg.gr (Εθνική Τράπεζα)
27%
4.50
2.
thetotalbusiness.com
25%
1.00
3.
mononews.gr
25%
2.00
4.
forin.gr
22%
2.00
5.
piraeusbank.gr (Τράπεζα Πειραιώς)
20%
4.50
6.
solomonk.gr
17%
5.00
7.
Alpha Bank
16%
6.00
8.
newmoney.gr
16%
6.30
9.
ot.gr
15%
6.00
10.
capital.gr
14%
7.40
02AI Rankings Matrix

Visibility coverage: where you appear vs. competitors

Real Greek-language buyer prompts, run against 4 AI engines — ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude. Mentions counted only when each brand is named in the answer or footnoted as a source. Indexing was triggered at 14:53 UTC; this matrix is a calibrated estimate built from the...

ChatGPT
GPT-5.4
60%you
vs 90% Εθνική Τράπεζα (NBG) · -30 pp gap
Gemini
3.1 Pro
70%you
vs 100% Εθνική Τράπεζα (NBG) · -30 pp gap
Perplexity
Sonar Large
70%you
vs 80% Εθνική Τράπεζα (NBG) · -10 pp gap
Claude
Sonnet 4.6
70%you
vs 80% Εθνική Τράπεζα (NBG) · -10 pp gap
AI coverage matrix
All 10 prompts shown
YouΕθνική Τράπεζα (NBG) (leader)Τράπεζα ΠειραιώςEurobankOptima / Attica / N26 / Revolut (combined)
#
Prompt
ChatGPT
Gemini
Perplexity
Claude
1
Vendor evaluation
Ποια είναι η καλύτερη τράπεζα στην Ελλάδα το 2026 για ιδιώτες
2
Vendor evaluation
Alpha Bank vs Eurobank vs Εθνική Τράπεζα vs Πειραιώς σύγκριση
3
Vendor evaluation
Ποια ελληνική τράπεζα έχει την καλύτερη εφαρμογή κινητής τηλεφωνίας
4
Vendor evaluation
Καλύτερες συστημικές τράπεζες Ελλάδας για άνοιγμα λογαριασμού
5
Retail lending
Καλύτερο στεγαστικό δάνειο 2026 στην Ελλάδα επιτόκιο
6
Retail lending
Πρόγραμμα Σπίτι μου ΙΙ ποια τράπεζα προσφέρει καλύτερους όρους
7
Retail lending
Καλύτερο καταναλωτικό δάνειο ελληνική τράπεζα
8
Business & Compliance
Καλύτερη τράπεζα για επιχειρήσεις και ΜμΕ στην Ελλάδα
9
Business & Compliance
Ταμείο Ανάκαμψης χρηματοδότηση επιχειρήσεων ποια τράπεζα
10
Digital & Investments
myAlpha Web e-banking σύγκριση με Eurobank και Πειραιώς

AI Coverage Leaderboard

i
Across all 10 prompt × 4 model cells
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
Εθνική Τράπεζα (NBG)
90%
1.40
2.
Τράπεζα Πειραιώς
83%
1.90
3.
Eurobank
78%
2.10
4.
Alpha Bank
65%
2.80
5.
Optima / Attica / N26 / Revolut (combined)
40%
4.20
03AI Crawlability Audit

Identify risk areas for your AI SEO Crawl strategy

Before your content can be cited, it has to be crawled and read. We tested five layers: 1) What your robots.txt declares, 2) what real users experience, 3) what AI search agents retrieve through WebSearch, 4) what bots get past your CDN, and 5) If your text content can be...

PHASE 1

Robots.txt analysis

2 critical bots blocked

What your robots.txt declares to each AI crawler, and which bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted.

RiskHighCrawlers24Allowed22Blocked2Partial0
robots.txt403· 4 linesFetched 27 Apr 14:52 UTC (browser context — server-side fetchers see Akamai 403)
🚨Key risks flagged
🛠
🔍
allowed!partialblocked
Bot
Provider
Role
Status
Rule applied
GPTBot
OpenAI
Training crawler
Block
Edge timeout (HTTP 408) under bot UA
ChatGPT-User
OpenAI
User-triggered fetch
Allow
HTTP 200 in 22.6s — slow but reaching
OAI-SearchBot
OpenAI
Search indexing
Allow
HTTP 200 in 22.8s
ClaudeBot
Anthropic
Training crawler
Allow
HTTP 200 in 15.8s
Claude-User
Anthropic
User-triggered fetch
Allow
HTTP 200 in 24.7s
Claude-SearchBot
Anthropic
Search indexing
Block
Edge timeout (HTTP 408)
anthropic-ai
Anthropic (legacy)
Allow
Inherits *
Google-Extended
Google
Training opt-out flag
Allow
Inherits * (no AI-bot scoping in robots.txt)
GoogleOther
Google
General fetcher
Allow
Inherits *
PerplexityBot
Perplexity
Search indexing
Allow
HTTP 200 in 25s
Perplexity-User
Perplexity
User-triggered fetch
Allow
HTTP 200 in 22.1s
CCBot
Common Crawl
Training crawler
Allow
Inherits *
Bytespider
ByteDance
Training crawler
Allow
Inherits *
Meta-ExternalAgent
Meta
Search indexing
Allow
Inherits *
Meta-ExternalFetcher
Meta
Search indexing
Allow
Inherits *
Applebot-Extended
Apple
Search indexing
Allow
Inherits *
Amazonbot
Amazon
Search indexing
Allow
Inherits *
DuckAssistBot
DuckDuckGo
Search indexing
Allow
Inherits *
Diffbot
Diffbot
Search indexing
Allow
Inherits *
Omgilibot
Webz.io
Search indexing
Allow
Inherits *
FriendlyCrawler
FriendlyCrawler
Search indexing
Allow
Inherits *
ImagesiftBot
Imagesift
Search indexing
Allow
Inherits *
Cohere-ai
Cohere
Training crawler
Allow
Inherits *
Timpibot
Timpi
Search indexing
Allow
Inherits *
PHASE 2

Virtual user crawl test

2 probes returned non-200

Headless visits from a 🇺🇸 US IP and a 🇬🇷 GR IP confirm the site is reachable for real readers — and therefore reachable for AI crawlers that proxy through the same regions. This is a sanity check, not a deep audit.

🇺🇸USsuccess
✅ Reachable from US IP (301 redirect to canonical Greek path)
301 HTTPblocked: false
🇬🇷GRsuccess
✅ Reachable from GR IP (301 redirect to canonical Greek path)
301 HTTPblocked: false
What this test returns6 fields per country
{
  "countryCode": "US",
  "status":      "success",
  "blocked":     false,
  "statusCode":  200,
  "error":       "",
  "summary":     "✅ Accessible from US IP"
}
The 6 fields
countryCodeISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country the test ran from
statusHigh-level outcome: success / failed / error
blockedWhether the site rejected the visitor (geo or anti-bot)
statusCodeHTTP status from the origin (e.g. 200, 403, 408)
errorError message if the fetch failed (otherwise empty)
summaryHuman-readable verdict
No HTML body, response time, headers, page title, or redirect chain — just the verdict.
PHASE 3

LLM web-search access

4 of 4 reachable

For each AI model, we asked the model's own web-search tool to fetch the site. We log whether it succeeded and which other domains the model surfaced alongside yours — those co-cited sources are the competition for attention in answers about your category.

Provider
Model
Status
Co-cited sources
Notes
OpenAI
gpt-5.4
Reachable
none — fetched directly
Used web-search and returned the live Delphi Economic Forum XI hero headline correctly in Greek. Fetch matched ground-truth. No citations attached to the response payload (gpt-5.4 frequently fetches without surfacing the citation), but `accessedTargetDomain` was confirmed via content match.
Anthropic
claude-sonnet-4-6
Reachable
none — fetched directly
Fetched the homepage, parsed both the Greek 'Άλφα Τράπεζα' name and the English description, and listed the bank's product taxonomy correctly. Latency 9.2s — slowest of the four. No domain citation in the structured payload.
Google
gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview
Reachable
alpha.gr
Fetched homepage successfully and explicitly cited https://alpha.gr/ as the primary source with `URL_RETRIEVAL_STATUS_SUCCESS`. Cleanest of the four results.
Perplexity
sonar
Reachable
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_Bankalphagrandrapids.orgremitly.com
Reached alpha.gr and cited it correctly as 'major Greek financial group founded in 1879'. But also co-cited Wikipedia, a same-named US church (alphagrandrapids.org), and Remitly's send-money page. Risk: Perplexity is partially attributing Alpha Bank facts to brand-name collisions. Two third-party sources currently outweigh your own page in their citation graph for English-language queries.
PHASE 4

Bot impersonation test

2 critical bots inaccessible

We sent requests using each bot's exact User-Agent string. This catches edge-case blocks at the WAF / Cloudflare / CDN layer that robots.txt doesn't reveal — and surfaces response-time outliers that quietly push crawlers past their abandon threshold.

Bot
Status
HTTP
Response time
oai-searchbot
accessible
200
22,800ms⚠️
chatgpt-user
accessible
200
22,600ms⚠️
gptbot
blocked
408
23,400ms
chatgpt-agent
blocked
301
9,200ms
perplexitybot
accessible
200
25,000ms⚠️
perplexity-user
accessible
200
22,100ms⚠️
googlebot
accessible
200
22,100ms⚠️
googlebot-smartphone
accessible
200
22,100ms⚠️
bingbot
accessible
200
18,900ms⚠️
bing-copilot
blocked
408
26,500ms
claudebot
accessible
200
15,800ms⚠️
claude-user
accessible
200
24,700ms⚠️
claude-searchbot
blocked
408
24,600ms
grok
blocked
301
5,000ms
deepseek
blocked
301
3,700ms
Two patterns to fix: (1) bingbot times out where every other bot succeeds — likely a CDN rule treating the legacy Bing user-agent as suspicious, while the modern bing-copilot sails through. (2) Slow bots (10s+) respond, but their response times are 5–10× the typical ~2s baseline. Most LLM crawlers abandon at 3–5s, so those bots are likely truncating or skipping your pages even when the HTTP says 200.
PHASE 5

Indexability · token depth

Majority of pages healthy

Pages over 10K tokens start to risk truncation; over 50K is a strong concern. Bloated rendered HTML — chrome, scripts, third-party widgets — pushes your real content past every model's effective context window.

Page
10K50K100K
Tokens
Status
Homepage
/
4.2K
Healthy
Mortgages — Στεγαστικά Δάνεια
/el/idiotes/daneia/stegastika-daneia
3.1K
Healthy
Business Banking — ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΣΕΙΣ
/el/Business
5.4K
Healthy
Investor Relations — Ενημέρωση Επενδύτων
/el/omilos/enimerosi-ependuton
11.2K
At risk
Press Releases — Δελτία Τύπου
/el/omilos/Grafeio-Typou/Press-Releases
8.9K
Healthy
Why these pages are heavy1 explanations
Investor Relations — Ενημέρωση Επενδύτων · /el/omilos/enimerosi-ependuton
Investor relations is in the risk zone (>10K). The current IR landing page sits between 11K–12K tokens and is heavy with navigation chrome before the financial highlights. Notably your archived IR page (/el/omilos/arxeio-alpha-services-and-holdings/...) scores HIGHER than the live one — RankBee gave the archive 2.50/10 and the live page 1.31/10. Investors and analyst LLMs are landing on yesterday's filings.
04Sentiment Snapshot

Brand perception: how AI models describe you to buyers

Buyer prompts grouped by intent cluster. We score sentiment from how each model frames you (or doesn't) in its answer — qualitative read on top of the visibility matrix. This surfaces which narratives AI models are building about your brand before a buyer ever visits your site....

Retail lending
3 prompts · 12 model responses analysed
Negative

Your weakest cluster. Cited in 6 of 12 responses for 'best mortgage 2026', 'Spiti Mou II', and 'consumer loan' prompts. NBG dominates the government-programme narrative (3.30 vs your 1.0 on the same query). When you ARE cited, it's via a different Alpha URL than the one you optimise for — RankBee's organic crawl found /stegastiko-daneio-alpha-katoikia scored 2.26 while your submitted /stegastika-daneia hub scored 1.0. Buyers asking 'τι επιτόκιο έχει η Alpha Bank' get rates from third-party listicles (newmoney.gr, solomonk.gr) instead of you.

Digital & Investments
1 prompts · 4 model responses analysed
Absent

Cited in 3 of 4 cells for 'myAlpha vs Eurobank vs Piraeus e-banking' — but the framing is unfavourable. Eurobank and Piraeus have feature-rich digital-product pages with screenshots and capability lists; your myAlpha hub is a tile-and-CTA layout with the substance behind login walls. When models compare apps, they describe Eurobank's Mobile App and Piraeus's winbank by feature, while you appear as 'also offers digital banking'.

Vendor evaluation
4 prompts · 16 model responses analysed
Neutral

You appear in roughly 13 of 16 'Big-Four bank comparison' responses — strong presence as one of the four systemic banks, always named alongside NBG, Eurobank, and Piraeus. But models describe you in legacy terms: 'founded 1879, third-largest by assets, ~20.79% market share'. The 2026 rebrand and the April Fitch upgrade to BB+/Positive don't appear in answers because the press release page (which scores 1st) doesn't surface those facts as quotable summary lines on the homepage. NBG and Piraeus carry stronger 'Bank of the Year' framing courtesy of capital.gr award coverage.

Business & Compliance
2 prompts · 8 model responses analysed
Neutral

Mixed results. On 'best bank for SME' you're cited in 4 of 4 cells thanks to mononews.gr's Morgan Stanley top-pick coverage and thetotalbusiness.com's banking-landscape piece — but the cited authority is the financial press, not your own pages. On Recovery Fund (Ταμείο Ανάκαμψης) you're cited in 1 of 4 cells: greece20.gov.gr, NBG, Piraeus, and the HDB.gr development-bank page crowd you out. Your /el/Business hub doesn't quote the eligibility logic that the gov pages publish.

Sentiment leaderboard

Share of voice across 10 prompts × 4 models
PosNeuAbs
1.
Εθνική Τράπεζα (NBG)
6 · 3 · 1
2.
Τράπεζα Πειραιώς
5 · 4 · 1
3.
Eurobank
4 · 5 · 1
4.
Alpha Bankyou
2 · 5 · 3
5.
Optima Bank
1 · 3 · 6
6.
Attica Bank
0 · 2 · 8

Frequently asked

What is a GAIO Deficit Report?

GAIO stands for Generative AI Optimization — getting your brand cited inside AI answers, not just ranked on a results page. The Deficit Report is RankBee's diagnostic: across leading AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews) and a tailored prompt set, it shows which answers your brand is missing from, which competitors take the citation in your place, and the technical and content reasons why.

Who is this for?

Anyone whose audience now turns to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Claude before making a decision. RankBee Audits are used by SaaS and B2B teams, e-commerce brands, agencies running client pitches, news and media publishers, political campaigns, and many others. If AI engines are part of how people discover, evaluate or talk about you, the audit is built for you.

How is this different from a traditional SEO audit?

A traditional audit grades you on Google's signals — backlinks, keywords, Core Web Vitals. RankBee grades you on what large language models actually reason about: entities, attributes, answer-first structure, citation-worthiness, and crawlability through the bot stack AI assistants use today (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended and 20 more). Strong Google rankings don't automatically translate into AI citations, and that gap is what the audit measures.

How does the audit work?

Four sections, each grounded in real data. Crawlability runs five technical phases: robots.txt rules, virtual-user probes from your target geographies, live LLM web-search fetches, bot-impersonation against your CDN, and token-depth indexability. Rankings Matrix runs your buyer prompts against up to 5 AI engines and logs every citation, co-citation, and competitor mention. Content Scorecard simulates AI ranking at the page level — RankBee ingests competitor content, generates variations, and scores yours 1–10 on the attributes models actually reward. Sentiment Snapshot reads how engines describe you when they do mention you, clustered by audience intent.

Where do the prompts come from?

RankBee discovers them for you. From just your brand name, domain, region and category, the platform generates and crawls thousands of AI prompts relevant to how real audiences ask about your space — then narrows them to the high-intent set that drives your visibility. You don't need to bring a keyword list, a competitor list, or hand-written prompts; the audit builds all of that automatically.

What does "invisible to AI" actually mean?

There are several distinct failure modes, and the audit isolates which ones are affecting you.

  • Uncrawlable. Your CDN blocks AI bots, or your rendered HTML buries the answer below their token budget, so models can't read your pages at all.
  • Crawlable but uncited. Bots can read you, but your content doesn't signal the attributes the model needs to recommend you, so it cites a directory, a competitor or Wikipedia instead.
  • Cited but mis-framed. You're mentioned, but the model attributes your facts to a subsidiary domain, or describes you in ways that don't reflect your positioning.
  • Locked out of live retrieval. When a user asks ChatGPT, Perplexity or Gemini a question right now, can the model fetch your page in real time to answer? The crawlability audit tests this end-to-end — many sites pass robots.txt but fail at the CDN or render layer, so live retrieval silently fails.
  • Excluded from training data. Can AI models use your content to train and refine their underlying knowledge? Your robots.txt and bot policies decide whether crawlers like GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and CCBot are allowed to ingest you. The audit shows exactly which training and search bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted, so you can make a deliberate choice rather than an accidental one.
How long does it take, and what do I need to provide?

Onboarding takes a few minutes; the full audit is delivered within roughly 48 hours. All you provide is your brand name, website, primary region, language, and category — RankBee handles prompt discovery, competitor identification, crawlability testing and content scoring from there. Rankings and sentiment data continue to refresh inside your dashboard so you can track how the citation pattern evolves.

What happens after the report — does it fix the issues?

The audit diagnoses; remediation happens in the rest of the platform. Most teams use the RankBee Toolkit to rewrite and re-test pages themselves, or RankBee Consulting for a fully managed engagement. The report includes prioritised recommendations so you know exactly which pages and attributes to tackle first.

Can I share the report with my team and stakeholders?

Yes — audit reports are sharable by link so it's easy to align marketing, content, technical SEO and leadership around the same data, and to brief agencies or executives without recreating the analysis. Account owners can switch a report to team-private at any time from RankBee.

How do I get a full audit?
Full audits are available to RankBee subscribers. The sample reports on this page show the structure and depth you'll receive; a full audit expands the prompt set for a statistically robust read across multiple intent clusters and refreshes alongside your ongoing tracking. If you're not yet a subscriber, start a free trial or book a demo and we'll walk you through the right plan for your brand.
Want this for your brand?

A live crawl audit, sentiment analysis, and AI visibility report — built for your domain.

This sample report runs a focused prompt set to show you the shape of the problem. A full paid report expands to 500 prompts across multiple topic clusters, giving you a statistically robust view of where your brand wins, where it's missing, and exactly what to fix.

Prepared by RankBee·rankbee.ai·RB-2026-04-AB-0427