Public sample

AI Visibility and Tech Audit for
SlotsCalendar

How an 'IMDb of online slots' positions itself against AI-assistant answers — measured across 5 pages, 10 buyer prompts and 5 AI engines, with a 5-phase crawl audit and bot-impersonation matrix.

Default visibility: public. Anyone with the link can read this report. Sign in to your RankBee account to make it private to your team.
SC
SlotsCalendar
slotscalendar.com
Generated20 May 2026
Audit windowLast 14 days
Report IDRB-AUDIT-SLOTSCAL-2026-05-20
What's in this report

Four sections covering technical access, AI visibility, content, and reputation.

This is more than a crawl audit. We measure where your buyers go to find you, what AI says when they ask, and what's missing from your story.

Content Scorecard
SECTION 01
Where SlotsCalendar's pages actually score

Five live RankBee scoring runs — homepage, new slots hub, casino bonuses, Pragmatic Play provider page, and free demo slots — benchmarked against every other page AI engines are surfacing for the same buyer queries.

19%of 100
Rank #10, −21 vs leader
AI Ranking Matrix
SECTION 02
1 of 50 cells. The category leader sits at 12.

Ten buyer prompts across slot discovery, provider releases, bonus comparison and free-play — run live against ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Overviews. SlotsCalendar is cited in 1 cell. SlotCatalog (12), Casinos.com (7), BigWinBoard (7) and Casino.org (7) lead.

2%of 50 prompt × model cells
Rank #24 · 2% cited
Crawlability & Indexing
SECTION 03
robots.txt is open. The WAF is closed.

robots.txt allows every named AI crawler. But the CDN / WAF times out ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and ChatGPT-Agent — and HTTP 403s our direct ground-truth fetch. The policy is permissive; the edge is not.

5 / 5pages reachable
2 urgent · 2 partial
Sentiment & Recommendation
SECTION 04
One positive mention. Three clusters absent.

Across four buyer-conversation clusters, SlotsCalendar is cited in 1 of 50 cells — a positive Perplexity mention on the slot-calendar query ("a widely used hub for tracking future titles"). Provider releases, bonus comparison and free-play discovery all return zero citations despite the /free-slots page scoring rank 2 in offline content scoring.

3of 4 clusters need attention
Absent
01Content Scorecard

Content Scorecard

Five pages scored live against every URL the AI engines surface for the same buyer queries. Raw RankBee score out of 10. The pattern is striking — SlotsCalendar's brand-defining 'free slots' page is genuinely competitive, but its money pages (bonuses, provider releases, new-slot...

Page-by-page scoring
As % · 5 pages graded
19% your avg40% leader avg
Page
Your score
Leader
Δ
Homepage
https://slotscalendar.com/
29%
32%
https://www.casino.org/us/slots/new/
3%
New slots
https://slotscalendar.com/new-slots
10%
26%
https://www.casino.org/us/slots/new/
16%
Casino bonuses
https://slotscalendar.com/casino-bonuses
13%
39%
https://thelistwire.usatoday.com/story/casinos/2026/05/14/best-no-deposit-casinos-ranked-for-may-2026/89337145007/
26%
Pragmatic Play provider page
https://slotscalendar.com/providers/pragmatic-play
10%
29%
https://www.yogonet.com/international/topics/pragmatic-play/
19%
Free slots
https://slotscalendar.com/free-slots
34%
40%
https://www.freeslots99.com/
6%

Content quality leaderboard

i
Weighted average across audited pages
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
FreeSlots99
40%
8.80
2.
TheListWire (USA Today)
32%
6.80
3.
Oddschecker
30%
9.00
4.
Yogonet
29%
9.00
5.
GameIndustry
25%
10.00
6.
Casino.org
23%
6.20
7.
Apps.apple.com
22%
8.60
8.
The Sun
21%
9.40
9.
SlotsLaunch
21%
9.40
10.
SlotsCalendar
19%
4.80
02AI Rankings Matrix

AI Ranking Matrix

Ten buyer prompts spanning slot discovery, provider releases, bonus comparison and free demo play — answered live by ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Overviews on 2026-05-20. The result is sobering: across 50 measured cells, slotscalendar.com is cited in exactly...

ChatGPT
BD via chatgpt.com
0%you
vs 10% SlotCatalog · -10 pp gap
Gemini
BD via gemini.google.com
0%you
vs 10% SlotCatalog · -10 pp gap
Perplexity
BD sonar / perplexity.ai
10%you
vs 30% SlotCatalog · -20 pp gap
Claude
Sonnet 4.6 + web_search
0%you
vs 40% SlotCatalog · -40 pp gap
Google AI Overviews
BD live AIO
0%you
vs 30% SlotCatalog · -30 pp gap
AI coverage matrix
All 10 prompts shown
YouSlotCatalog (leader)Casinos.comBigWinBoardCasino.org
#
Prompt
ChatGPT
Gemini
Perplexity
Claude
Google AI Overviews
1
Slot discovery
What are the best new slot releases this month?
2
Slot discovery
Where can I find a calendar of upcoming slot games for 2026?
3
Slot discovery
What are the most popular online slots of 2026?
4
Provider releases
What are the new Pragmatic Play slot games for 2026?
5
Provider releases
What is NoLimit City's latest slot release in 2026?
6
Provider releases
Where can I see all upcoming Play'n GO slot releases?
7
Bonus comparison
What are the best online slot casino welcome bonuses right now?
8
Bonus comparison
Which sites have the best no-deposit free spins offers for slots?
9
Free-play discovery
Where can I play online slots for free without registering?
10
Free-play discovery
Where can I find a free demo of the slot game Sweet Bonanza?

AI Coverage Leaderboard

i
Across 50 prompt × model cells
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
SlotCatalog
24%
1.67
2.
Casinos.com
14%
1.71
3.
BigWinBoard
14%
2.14
4.
Casino.org
14%
1.57
5.
FruitySlots
12%
1.83
6.
Pragmatic Play
12%
1.83
7.
GameIndustry
12%
1.83
8.
SlotsTemple
10%
1.40
9.
YouTube
10%
2.20
10.
PokerNews
10%
1.40
11.
Oddschecker
8%
1.00
12.
Play'n GO
8%
1.25
13.
OLBG
8%
1.50
14.
AboutSlots
8%
1.50
15.
Compare.bet
8%
2.50
16.
GamesHub
8%
3.75
17.
Yogonet
6%
1.67
18.
NoLimit City
6%
1.00
19.
The Sun
6%
2.33
24.
SlotsCalendar
2%
1.00
03AI Crawlability Audit

Crawlability & Indexing

The robots policy welcomes every AI bot by name. But the WAF / CDN times out half the assistant-side fetchers — and returns HTTP 403 to a direct ground-truth fetch. The contradiction matters: Gemini and Perplexity reach the page and cite it; Anthropic and ChatGPT-Agent cannot,...

PHASE 1

Robots.txt analysis

Permissive — all bots allowed

What your robots.txt declares to each AI crawler, and which bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted.

RiskLowCrawlers20Allowed20Blocked0Partial0
robots.txt200· 20 lines2026-05-20T06:25:25Z
🚨Key risks flagged
🛠
🔍
allowed!partialblocked
Bot
Provider
Role
Status
Rule applied
GPTBot
OpenAI
Training crawler
Allow
Allow
ChatGPT-User
OpenAI
On-demand fetcher
Allow
Allow
OAI-SearchBot
OpenAI
SearchGPT indexer
Allow
Allow
ClaudeBot
Anthropic
Training crawler
Allow
Allow
Claude-User
Anthropic
On-demand fetcher
Allow
Allow
Claude-SearchBot
Anthropic
Search indexer
Allow
Allow
anthropic-ai
Anthropic
Legacy crawler
Allow
Allow
Google-Extended
Google
Gemini training opt-out
Allow
Allow
GoogleOther
Google
Misc fetchers
Allow
Allow
PerplexityBot
Perplexity
Training crawler
Allow
Allow
Perplexity-User
Perplexity
On-demand fetcher
Allow
Allow
CCBot
Common Crawl
Web archive
Allow
Allow
Bytespider
ByteDance
TikTok / Doubao
Allow
Allow
Meta-ExternalAgent
Meta
Llama training
Allow
Allow
Meta-ExternalFetcher
Meta
Llama fetcher
Allow
Allow
Applebot-Extended
Apple
Apple Intelligence
Allow
Allow
Amazonbot
Amazon
Alexa+ / Q
Allow
Allow
DuckAssistBot
DuckDuckGo
DuckAssist
Allow
Allow
Diffbot
Diffbot
Knowledge graph
Allow
Allow
Cohere-ai
Cohere
Command-R training
Allow
Allow
PHASE 2

Virtual user crawl test

1 probe returned non-200

Headless visit from a 🇺🇸 US IP confirm the site is reachable for real readers — and therefore reachable for AI crawlers that proxy through the same regions. This is a sanity check, not a deep audit.All checks OK — click to expand

🇺🇸USsuccess
Accessible from US IP. 301 redirect chain resolves to slotscalendar.com.
301 HTTPblocked: false
What this test returns6 fields per country
{
  "countryCode": "US",
  "status":      "success",
  "blocked":     false,
  "statusCode":  200,
  "error":       "",
  "summary":     "✅ Accessible from US IP"
}
The 6 fields
countryCodeISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country the test ran from
statusHigh-level outcome: success / failed / error
blockedWhether the site rejected the visitor (geo or anti-bot)
statusCodeHTTP status from the origin (e.g. 200, 403, 408)
errorError message if the fetch failed (otherwise empty)
summaryHuman-readable verdict
No HTML body, response time, headers, page title, or redirect chain — just the verdict.
PHASE 3

LLM web-search access

4 reachable · 1 not reachable

For each AI model, we asked the model's own web-search tool to fetch the site. We log whether it succeeded and which other domains the model surfaced alongside yours — those co-cited sources are the competition for attention in answers about your category.

Provider
Model
Status
Co-cited sources
Notes
OpenAI (GPT-5.4)
gpt-5.4
Reachable
chatgpt.com (internal)
PARTIAL. OpenAI's web tool reported fetched=true and returned the correct heading ('SlotsCalendar - Calendaring All Video Slots') but did NOT cite the target domain in its sources — answer was based on SERP snippets rather than the live page. This is the failure mode behind 'why is SlotsCalendar described accurately in ChatGPT answers but never cited as the source?'.
Anthropic (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
claude-sonnet-4-6
Not reachable
none — fetched directly
BLOCKED. Claude's web tool returned: 'The URL could not be accessed — the site may be down, the URL may be incorrect, or there may be network/blocking issues preventing the tool from reaching the page.' This is consistent with the 408 timeouts ClaudeBot, Claude-User and Claude-SearchBot all hit at the edge. Claude answers about SlotsCalendar therefore come from training data, not the live site.
Google (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite)
gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview
Reachable
slotscalendar.com
ACCESSIBLE. Gemini fetched the page and cited slotscalendar.com directly. Live answers reflect live content.
Perplexity (sonar)
sonar
Reachable
slotscalendar.comslotscalendar.com/no-deposit-free-spins/slotscalendar.com/no-deposit-bonus/slotscalendar.com/social-tournaments/slotscalendar.com/uk/slotscalendar.com/awards/slotscalendar.com/forum/
ACCESSIBLE. Perplexity sonar cited 8 SlotsCalendar URLs — the broadest engine-side citation footprint in the run. This is the only engine that surfaces deep pages (no-deposit hubs, the forum, country-specific UK page).
Google AI Overviews (live SERP)
Live AIO
Reachable
none — fetched directly
MEASURED. Google AI Overviews returned 10/10 responses via Bright Data dataset gd_mcswdt6z2elth3zqr2 (google.com/aimode, GB). Zero of those 10 answers cite slotscalendar.com. The top AIO citations were Oddschecker (11 mentions), The Sun (5 mentions), NoLimit City press releases (5), Yogonet (3), FruitySlots (3) and Pragmatic Play.com (3). AIO behaviour for these UK slot queries is dominated by Oddschecker / OLBG / The Sun on bonuses, by studio .com domains on provider releases, and by SlotCatalog / Casino.org / Casinos.com on discovery.
PHASE 4

Bot impersonation test

4 critical bots inaccessible

We sent requests using each bot's exact User-Agent string. This catches edge-case blocks at the WAF / Cloudflare / CDN layer that robots.txt doesn't reveal — and surfaces response-time outliers that quietly push crawlers past their abandon threshold.

Bot
Status
HTTP
Response time
oai-searchbot
accessible
200
21,900ms⚠️
chatgpt-user
accessible
200
25,000ms⚠️
gptbot
accessible
200
23,100ms⚠️
chatgpt-agent
blocked
408
30,400ms (timeout)
perplexitybot
blocked
408
29,700ms (timeout)
perplexity-user
blocked
408
31,900ms (timeout)
googlebot
accessible
200
26,000ms⚠️
googlebot-smartphone
blocked
408
31,700ms (timeout)
bingbot
accessible
200
22,600ms⚠️
bing-copilot
blocked
301
5,800ms
claudebot
blocked
408
28,900ms (timeout)
claude-user
blocked
408
31,200ms (timeout)
claude-searchbot
blocked
408
27,500ms (timeout)
grok
blocked
301
3,300ms
deepseek
blocked
301
3,800ms
Patterns to investigate: Review any blocked or slow bots above — bots responding in 10s+ are likely truncating or skipping your pages even when the HTTP says 200. Most LLM crawlers abandon at 3–5s. Note: we don't yet know if these are real production issues; they require deeper infrastructure investigation to confirm.
PHASE 5

Indexability · token depth

3 of 5 pages at risk

Pages over 10K tokens start to risk truncation; over 50K is a strong concern. Bloated rendered HTML — chrome, scripts, third-party widgets — pushes your real content past every model's effective context window.

Page
10K50K100K
Tokens
Status
Homepage
https://slotscalendar.com/
8.4K
Healthy
New slots
https://slotscalendar.com/new-slots
14.2K
At risk
Casino bonuses
https://slotscalendar.com/casino-bonuses
18.6K
At risk
Pragmatic Play provider
https://slotscalendar.com/providers/pragmatic-play
9.8K
Healthy
Free slots
https://slotscalendar.com/free-slots
11.9K
At risk
Why these pages are heavy3 explanations
New slots · https://slotscalendar.com/new-slots
Sits above the 10K AI-ingest sweet spot. Most tokens are repeating game-card markup — providers, dates and feature notes are short or absent per card, which is why citation density on prompts 1-3 is lower than SlotCatalog and BigWinBoard.
Casino bonuses · https://slotscalendar.com/casino-bonuses
Token-heavy but coverage-light. Wagering, max-cashout, game-contribution and state-eligibility metadata is missing per offer — the categories the leading US publishers always include. The page reads as 'lots of offers' to a human and as 'no structured fields' to an LLM.
Free slots · https://slotscalendar.com/free-slots
The strongest page by Section 01 score (3.36/10, rank 2). Token weight is concentrated on a real catalogue claim ('23,025+ demo slots') and 'no-registration' messaging — which is exactly the field FreeSlots99 wins on. Closing the 0.64-point gap is procedural: an HTML5 walkthrough and structured FAQ.
04Sentiment Snapshot

Sentiment & Recommendation

Sentiment is constrained by visibility — SlotsCalendar appears in only 1 of 50 measured cells (Perplexity, slot-calendar query, positively framed: ‘widely used hub for tracking future titles’). The other 49 cells route to SlotCatalog (12 cells across all four clusters),...

Provider releases (Pragmatic Play, NoLimit City, Play'n GO)
3 prompts · 12 model responses analysed
Absent

SlotsCalendar is cited in 0 of 15 cells in this cluster. Yogonet (3 cells via Perplexity+AIO press-release wire for Pragmatic Play), BigWinBoard (4 cells via Claude+AIO weekly editorial), FruitySlots (3 cells via ChatGPT+AIO for Play'n GO), Compare.bet and GamesHub (2 cells each) take this cluster. Pragmatic Play and Play'n GO's own .com domains are also frequently cited (6 and 4 cells respectively) — AI is more comfortable citing the studio directly than the third-party calendar that aggregates the studio's releases. SlotsCalendar's provider pages (RankBee score 1.0/10, rank 10) are not being surfaced.

Bonus comparison (slot bonuses, no-deposit, welcome offers)
2 prompts · 8 model responses analysed
Absent

SlotsCalendar is cited in 0 of 10 cells in this cluster. Google AI Overviews owns this cluster on the UK side — Oddschecker appears in 11 cells (counting mentions) split across both prompts, plus The Sun (5 mentions on prompt 7+8). OLBG owns Perplexity on no-deposit (6 mentions in prompt 8). AskGamblers picks up 2 cells (both via ChatGPT). The /casino-bonuses page (RankBee score 1.31/10, rank 7) trails AskGamblers by 0.47 points in offline scoring and is invisible on the live citation matrix.

Free-play discovery (demo slots, no-registration play)
2 prompts · 8 model responses analysed
Absent

SlotsCalendar is cited in 0 of 10 cells in this cluster — even though /free-slots is its highest-scoring page (3.36/10, rank 2 in Section 01, second only to FreeSlots99). SlotsTemple takes this cluster with 5 cells (via ChatGPT+Perplexity+Claude on Sweet Bonanza demo), SlotCatalog 3 cells, VegasSlotsOnline and Casino.org 3 cells each on the 'free slots no registration' prompt. Pragmatic Play.com itself gets cited 3 times on the Sweet Bonanza demo prompt — AI prefers the studio's own demo to the aggregator's. This is the most painful cluster: the page IS competitive on offline scoring but invisible at live citation.

Slot discovery (new releases, calendars, 2026 roundups)
3 prompts · 12 model responses analysed
Neutral

SlotsCalendar is cited in 1 of 15 cells in this cluster — exclusively in Perplexity's answer to 'where can I find a calendar of upcoming slot games for 2026' (3 mentions, positively framed as 'a widely used hub for tracking future titles'). SlotCatalog dominates with 7 cells (mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and AIO for the same query — plus picked up on prompts 1, 3 and 10 elsewhere). BigWinBoard, Casino.org, Casinos.com and GameIndustry each pick up 2-5 cells. The /new-slots and homepage pages get zero engine citations on prompts 1 and 3 ('best new slot releases this month' and 'most popular slots of 2026') — those queries route to Reddit, FruitySlots, PokerNews and YouTube instead of any slot-aggregator site.

Sentiment leaderboard

Share of voice across 10 prompts × 4 models
PosNeuAbs
1.
SlotCatalog
1 · 2 · 1
2.
BigWinBoard
0 · 3 · 1
3.
Casino.org
0 · 3 · 1
4.
AboutSlots
0 · 3 · 1
5.
Casinos.com
0 · 2 · 2
6.
FruitySlots
0 · 2 · 2
7.
Pragmatic Play
0 · 2 · 2
8.
GameIndustry
0 · 2 · 2
9.
SlotsTemple
0 · 2 · 2
10.
Oddschecker
0 · 2 · 2
11.
OLBG
0 · 2 · 2
12.
Compare.bet
0 · 2 · 2
13.
GamesHub
0 · 2 · 2
14.
The Sun
0 · 2 · 2

Frequently asked

What is a GAIO Audit Report?

GAIO stands for Generative AI Optimization — getting your brand cited inside AI answers, not just ranked on a results page. The Deficit Report is RankBee's diagnostic: across leading AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews) and a tailored prompt set, it shows which answers your brand is missing from, which competitors take the citation in your place, and the technical and content reasons why.

Who is this for?

Anyone whose audience now turns to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Claude before making a decision. RankBee Audits are used by SaaS and B2B teams, e-commerce brands, agencies running client pitches, news and media publishers, political campaigns, and many others. If AI engines are part of how people discover, evaluate or talk about you, the audit is built for you.

How is this different from a traditional SEO audit?

A site can hold position 1 on Google and be completely absent from ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity answers for the same query — because the two systems use entirely different signals to decide what to surface. A traditional audit grades you on Google's signals — backlinks, keywords, Core Web Vitals. RankBee grades you on what large language models actually reason about: entities, attributes, answer-first structure, citation-worthiness, and crawlability through the bot stack AI assistants use today (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended and 20 more). Strong Google rankings don't automatically translate into AI citations, and that gap is what the audit measures.

How does the audit work?

Four sections, each grounded in real data. Crawlability runs five technical phases: robots.txt rules, virtual-user probes from your target geographies, live LLM web-search fetches, bot-impersonation against your CDN, and token-depth indexability. Rankings Matrix runs your buyer prompts against up to 5 AI engines and logs every citation, co-citation, and competitor mention. Content Scorecard simulates AI ranking at the page level — RankBee ingests competitor content, generates variations, and scores yours 1–10 on the attributes models actually reward. Sentiment Snapshot reads how engines describe you when they do mention you, clustered by audience intent. The Rankings Matrix also shows every buyer question your brand is missing from — and which competitor takes the citation in your place, across each of the five AI engines tested.

Where do the prompts come from?

RankBee discovers them for you. From just your brand name, domain, region and category, the platform generates and crawls thousands of AI prompts relevant to how real audiences ask about your space — then narrows them to the high-intent set that drives your visibility. You don't need to bring a keyword list, a competitor list, or hand-written prompts; the audit builds all of that automatically.

What does "invisible to AI" actually mean?

There are several distinct failure modes, and the audit isolates which ones are affecting you.

  • Uncrawlable. Your CDN blocks AI bots, or your rendered HTML buries the answer below their token budget, so models can't read your pages at all. This is the most common silent failure: robots.txt shows no restrictions, but a CDN-layer rule — often a default "Block AI Scrapers" toggle enabled without the site owner's knowledge — returns a 403 to every AI crawler before the request reaches your server. The audit runs bot-impersonation probes that replicate the exact request signature of GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot against your live CDN to catch this.
  • Crawlable but uncited. Bots can reach and read your pages, but your content doesn't signal the attributes AI models need to recommend you — so the engine cites a directory, a competitor, or Wikipedia instead. The Content Scorecard scores your pages against the content actually winning citations for your target queries, attribute by attribute, so you can see exactly what to fix.
  • Cited but mis-framed. You're mentioned, but the model describes you in ways that don't reflect your positioning — attributes your facts to a subsidiary domain, describes a product you no longer offer, or associates you with a framing you don't own. This typically means AI engines are pulling from inconsistent third-party sources. The Sentiment Snapshot classifies every mention and maps the source of the mis-framing.
  • Locked out of live retrieval. When a user asks ChatGPT, Perplexity or Gemini a question right now, the model attempts a live web fetch to retrieve up-to-date information before answering. Many sites pass robots.txt checks but fail at the CDN or render layer when a real-time fetch is attempted — so live retrieval silently fails and the model falls back to cached training data, or omits your brand entirely. The audit tests this end-to-end: OAI-SearchBot (OpenAI's live retrieval crawler, distinct from GPTBot) requires explicit permission and an accessible render layer — both are checked as part of Phase 3.
  • Excluded from training data. Your robots.txt and bot policies determine whether AI training crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, CCBot — are allowed to ingest your content for model training and refinement. The audit shows exactly which training and search bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted, so you can make a deliberate choice rather than an accidental one. For reference: Cloudflare's managed robots.txt and AI bot blocking documentation explains how CDN-level rules interact with and can override your robots.txt directives.
How long does it take, and what do I need to provide?

Onboarding takes a few minutes; the full audit is delivered within roughly 48 hours. All you provide is your brand name, website, primary region, language, and category — RankBee handles prompt discovery, competitor identification, crawlability testing and content scoring from there. Rankings and sentiment data continue to refresh inside your dashboard so you can track how the citation pattern evolves.

What happens after the report — does it fix the issues?

The audit diagnoses; remediation happens in the rest of the platform. Most teams use the RankBee Toolkit to rewrite and re-test pages themselves, or RankBee Consulting for a fully managed engagement. The report includes prioritised recommendations so you know exactly which pages and attributes to tackle first.

Can I share the report with my team and stakeholders?

Yes — audit reports are sharable by link so it's easy to align marketing, content, technical SEO and leadership around the same data, and to brief agencies or executives without recreating the analysis. Account owners can switch a report to team-private at any time from RankBee.

How do I get a full audit?
Full audits are available to RankBee subscribers. The sample reports on this page show the structure and depth you'll receive; a full audit expands the prompt set for a statistically robust read across multiple intent clusters and refreshes alongside your ongoing tracking. If you're not yet a subscriber, start a free trial or book a demo and we'll walk you through the right plan for your brand.
What this means for SlotsCalendar

1 of 50 cells. The catalogue is right. The distribution is gone.

robots.txt welcomes every AI bot — that's the right call. But across 50 measured cells (10 buyer prompts × ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews), slotscalendar.com is cited exactly once — a positive Perplexity mention on the upcoming-slots-calendar query. The /free-slots page, scored at rank 2 of 12 in offline RankBee scoring (3.36/10), got zero citations. The /casino-bonuses page got zero. The Pragmatic Play provider page got zero. The category leader SlotCatalog took 12 cells; BigWinBoard, Casinos.com and Casino.org each took 7; Oddschecker, OLBG and The Sun together took the bonus cluster; Yogonet took provider releases. None of these gaps need a new product — they need the WAF rules to let the bots in that the robots file already allows, plus dated, citation-dense editorial that AI engines are willing to cite by URL. RankBee runs the full diagnostic monthly and pinpoints which page-level fixes move which AI engine. Worth a 20-minute conversation with Denisa.

Prepared by RankBee·rankbee.ai·RB-AUDIT-SLOTSCAL-2026-05-20