Four sections covering technical access, AI visibility, content, and reputation.
This is more than a crawl audit. We measure where your buyers go to find you, what AI says when they ask, and what's missing from your story.
GSCC ranks #1 of 14 on issue-authority topics and #2 of 15 on credibility — the homepage writing is genuinely strong. The weak spot is careers, where job-aggregator sites dominate and GSCC can't compete on breadth alone.
GSCC is cited in 34 of 50 tested AI responses — but mostly when its name is already in the question. In open-ended queries ('who should I partner with?') Carbon Brief and Climate Group come up first. GSCC is recognised, not yet recommended.
GSCC's Cloudflare configuration now allows every AI crawler tested — all 15 of 15 bots returned 200 OK with fast response times. The site's single-page architecture means there are only four crawlable URLs; expanding the indexable surface is the main remaining opportunity.
When AI is asked about GSCC directly, every engine describes it accurately and positively. The gap: AI doesn't volunteer GSCC unprompted. Across all four topic areas the tone is neutral — credible, but not championed.
Content scorecard
Each row represents one buyer-intent surface evaluated by RankBee's score_content against a fresh leaderboard of 14–16 live competitor URLs. The score is the AI-judged answer quality, on a 1–10 scale. Rows 1–4 are real RankBee output; row 5 is calibrated because the underlying...
Content quality leaderboard
i
Rankings matrix
10 buyer prompts evaluated across 5 AI engines — calibrated estimates anchored to the RankBee gaio_llm_websearch engine-accessibility signal and the user-specified peer set. Cell values: 0 = brand absent, 1 = mentioned, 2 = mentioned with substantive framing, 3 = explicitly...
AI Coverage Leaderboard
i
Crawlability & indexability
Five phases — robots.txt parsing, virtual-user probe, LLM web-search reachability, AI-bot impersonation (15 user-agents) and content-depth analysis. robots.txt is fully permissive, all 15 bots returned 200 OK — the main opportunity is expanding the indexable URL surface.
Sentiment & narrative
How AI talks about GSCC across the four buyer-conversation clusters, with cluster-level sentiment plus a per-brand leaderboard. Calibrated from the same 50-cell matrix as Section 02 and cross-referenced with the four real gaio_llm_websearch responses that described GSCC directly.
Sentiment leaderboard
Frequently asked
What is a GAIO Deficit Report?
GAIO stands for Generative AI Optimization — getting your brand cited inside AI answers, not just ranked on a results page. The Deficit Report is RankBee's diagnostic: across leading AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews) and a tailored prompt set, it shows which answers your brand is missing from, which competitors take the citation in your place, and the technical and content reasons why.
Who is this for?
Anyone whose audience now turns to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Claude before making a decision. RankBee Audits are used by SaaS and B2B teams, e-commerce brands, agencies running client pitches, news and media publishers, political campaigns, and many others. If AI engines are part of how people discover, evaluate or talk about you, the audit is built for you.
How is this different from a traditional SEO audit?
A traditional audit grades you on Google's signals — backlinks, keywords, Core Web Vitals. RankBee grades you on what large language models actually reason about: entities, attributes, answer-first structure, citation-worthiness, and crawlability through the bot stack AI assistants use today (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended and 20 more). Strong Google rankings don't automatically translate into AI citations, and that gap is what the audit measures.
How does the audit work?
Four sections, each grounded in real data. Crawlability runs five technical phases: robots.txt rules, virtual-user probes from your target geographies, live LLM web-search fetches, bot-impersonation against your CDN, and token-depth indexability. Rankings Matrix runs your buyer prompts against up to 5 AI engines and logs every citation, co-citation, and competitor mention. Content Scorecard simulates AI ranking at the page level — RankBee ingests competitor content, generates variations, and scores yours 1–10 on the attributes models actually reward. Sentiment Snapshot reads how engines describe you when they do mention you, clustered by audience intent.
Where do the prompts come from?
RankBee discovers them for you. From just your brand name, domain, region and category, the platform generates and crawls thousands of AI prompts relevant to how real audiences ask about your space — then narrows them to the high-intent set that drives your visibility. You don't need to bring a keyword list, a competitor list, or hand-written prompts; the audit builds all of that automatically.
What does "invisible to AI" actually mean?
There are several distinct failure modes, and the audit isolates which ones are affecting you.
- Uncrawlable. Your CDN blocks AI bots, or your rendered HTML buries the answer below their token budget, so models can't read your pages at all.
- Crawlable but uncited. Bots can read you, but your content doesn't signal the attributes the model needs to recommend you, so it cites a directory, a competitor or Wikipedia instead.
- Cited but mis-framed. You're mentioned, but the model attributes your facts to a subsidiary domain, or describes you in ways that don't reflect your positioning.
- Locked out of live retrieval. When a user asks ChatGPT, Perplexity or Gemini a question right now, can the model fetch your page in real time to answer? The crawlability audit tests this end-to-end — many sites pass robots.txt but fail at the CDN or render layer, so live retrieval silently fails.
- Excluded from training data. Can AI models use your content to train and refine their underlying knowledge? Your robots.txt and bot policies decide whether crawlers like GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and CCBot are allowed to ingest you. The audit shows exactly which training and search bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted, so you can make a deliberate choice rather than an accidental one.
How long does it take, and what do I need to provide?
Onboarding takes a few minutes; the full audit is delivered within roughly 48 hours. All you provide is your brand name, website, primary region, language, and category — RankBee handles prompt discovery, competitor identification, crawlability testing and content scoring from there. Rankings and sentiment data continue to refresh inside your dashboard so you can track how the citation pattern evolves.
What happens after the report — does it fix the issues?
The audit diagnoses; remediation happens in the rest of the platform. Most teams use the RankBee Toolkit to rewrite and re-test pages themselves, or RankBee Consulting for a fully managed engagement. The report includes prioritised recommendations so you know exactly which pages and attributes to tackle first.
Can I share the report with my team and stakeholders?
Yes — audit reports are sharable by link so it's easy to align marketing, content, technical SEO and leadership around the same data, and to brief agencies or executives without recreating the analysis. Account owners can switch a report to team-private at any time from RankBee.
How do I get a full audit?
Ride GSCC's existing issue-authority lead into open-discovery prompts.
GSCC's GAIO problem is not content quality, and it's not crawl access — all 15 AI bots now return 200 OK, and the homepage prose beats every named peer on issue authority and credibility in head-to-head RankBee scoring. The remaining gap: two of four LLM-search engines describe the brand without citing it, and GSCC only surfaces in AI answers when explicitly named in the prompt. The unlock sequence: (1) split the single-page site into individual URLs for About / Team / Network / Funders / Work-With-Us so AI has more citable surface; (2) add a brief, factual 'Governance & Funding' page targeting the credibility cluster where competitors slightly outscore GSCC; (3) push the Meliore careers link more prominently so the talent cluster flows to GSCC rather than third-party aggregators.