Public sample

AI Visibility and Tech Audit for
DAZN Bet

10 buyer prompts × 5 AI engines via SERP and live LLM probes · 10 pages scored against UK sportsbook competitors · 15 bots impersonated · 4 LLM web-search providers tested · UK Gambling Commission market.

Default visibility: public. Anyone with the link can read this report. Sign in to your RankBee account to make it private to your team.
DB
DAZN Bet
daznbet.com
Generated2026-05-14
Audit windowLast 14 days
Report IDGAIO-DAZNBET-2026-05-14
What's in this report

Four sections covering technical access, AI visibility, content, and reputation.

This is more than a crawl audit. We measure where your buyers go to find you, what AI says when they ask, and what's missing from your story.

01Content Scorecard

Content scoring vs live UK sportsbook competitors

10 DAZN Bet pages scored 1-10 against the top organic competitors RankBee identified in real time. Of the 10 pages, 9 sit at the floor (1.0/10) — only the homepage rose above it (1.55/10).

Page-by-page scoring
As % · 10 pages graded
11% your avg48% leader avg
Page
Your score
Leader
Δ
Homepage
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb
16%
48%
https://bookiesbonuses.com/
33%
Football category
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb/sports/football
10%
47%
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/football-betting-sites-b2582633.html
37%
Premier League (deeper)
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb/sports/football/england/england-premier-league-bg-1381
10%
46%
https://www.oddschecker.com/us/soccer/premier-league
36%
Tennis
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb/sports/tennis
10%
33%
https://www.boylesports.com/sports/tennis/in-play
23%
Boxing
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb/sports/boxing
10%
30%
https://www.olbg.com/bookmakers/articles/top-bookies-for-boxing-betting
20%
Horse Racing
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb/sports/horse-racing
10%
33%
https://gg.co.uk/bookmaker/best-odds-guaranteed-sites/
23%
American Football
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb/sports/american-football
10%
43%
https://www.gameshub.com/uk/betting-sites/nfl/super-bowl/
33%
Casino top
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb/casino
10%
24%
https://www.olbg.com/casino-sites
14%
Casino slots
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb/casino/slots
10%
29%
https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/26105616.best-slots-sites-uk-2026---play-top-online-slots-real-money/
19%
Promotions
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb/promotions
10%
30%
https://next.io/betting-sites-uk/free-bets/
20%

Content quality leaderboard

i
Weighted average across audited pages
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
Bookies Bonuses
48%
6.40
2.
advancedneurosurg.com
46%
5.80
3.
GamesHub
43%
6.30
4.
Sportsmole
33%
6.50
5.
GG.co.uk
33%
6.40
6.
Oxford Mail
29%
6.50
7.
Independent
27%
5.10
8.
Box.live
26%
6.60
9.
Andy's Bet Club
24%
6.60
26.
DAZN Bet
11%
4.90
02AI Rankings Matrix

How AI engines rank UK sportsbooks for buyer prompts

10 high-intent UK buyer prompts run live against Google UK SERPs (10 of 10 returned data) and against the LLM web-search layer for the brand domain probe. DAZN Bet did NOT appear in the Google top 10 for any of the 10 prompts. Cell coverage below estimates per-engine citation...

ChatGPT
GPT-5.4 (web_search)
13%you
vs 100% bet365 · -87 pp gap
Gemini
3.1 flash-lite
13%you
vs 100% bet365 · -87 pp gap
Perplexity
sonar
13%you
vs 100% bet365 · -87 pp gap
Claude
sonnet-4-6 (web_search)
13%you
vs 100% bet365 · -87 pp gap
Google AIO
AI Overviews
13%you
vs 100% bet365 · -87 pp gap
AI coverage matrix
All 10 prompts shown
Youbet365 (leader)William HillSky BetPaddy Power
#
Prompt
ChatGPT
Gemini
Perplexity
Claude
Google AIO
1
Vendor evaluation
What is the best UK sports betting site for 2026? Compare top brands by sports coverage, odds, mobile app, in-play and live streaming.
2
Vendor evaluation
DAZN Bet vs bet365 vs Sky Bet — which UK sportsbook is best for football betting in 2026?
3
Vendor evaluation
Best UK bookmaker for Premier League football betting in 2026 — compare odds, bet builders and promotions.
4
Sport product depth
Best UK sportsbook for live in-play betting, bet builders and cash-out in 2026.
5
Sport product depth
Best UK bookmaker for boxing in 2026 — fight night odds, method of victory markets and free bets.
6
Sport product depth
Best UK bookmakers for horse racing in 2026 — Cheltenham, Royal Ascot, daily race cards and Best Odds Guaranteed.
7
Compliance and responsible gambling
Which UK sports betting brands are licensed by the UK Gambling Commission, and how do they handle responsible gambling tools?
8
Compliance and responsible gambling
Best UK sportsbook welcome offers in 2026 — what are the wagering requirements, GamStop coverage and fairness terms?
9
Casino and platform
Best UK online casino sites for slots, live dealer and table games in 2026.
10
Casino and platform
What sportsbook platform powers DAZN Bet, and how does its technology compare to bet365, Sky Bet and William Hill?

AI Coverage Leaderboard

i
Across 40 prompt × model cells (generic prompts only)
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
bet365
20%
1.38
2.
William Hill
20%
2.00
3.
Sky Bet
20%
3.00
4.
Paddy Power
20%
2.75
5.
Betfred
20%
4.25
6.
Coral
20%
4.38
7.
Ladbrokes
20%
5.00
8.
LiveScore Bet
10%
6.88
9.
BetMGM UK
5%
7.88
10.
DAZN Bet
3%
8.13
03AI Crawlability Audit

Crawlability — robots, virtual user, LLM access, bot impersonation, indexability

RankBee ran a five-phase audit against daznbet.com: robots.txt directives, a virtual-user probe from a US IP, four LLM provider web-search probes, 15 bot impersonations, and content-depth indexability across the five most strategic pages.

PHASE 1

Robots.txt analysis

Permissive — all bots allowed

What your robots.txt declares to each AI crawler, and which bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted.

RiskLowCrawlers18Allowed18Blocked0Partial0
robots.txt200· 6 lines2026-05-14T11:59:33Z
🚨Key risks flagged
🛠
🔍
allowed!partialblocked
Bot
Provider
Role
Status
Rule applied
GPTBot
OpenAI
Allow
Allow
ChatGPT-User
OpenAI
Allow
Allow
OAI-SearchBot
OpenAI
Allow
Allow
ClaudeBot
Anthropic
Allow
Allow
Claude-User
Anthropic
Allow
Allow
Claude-SearchBot
Anthropic
Allow
Allow
anthropic-ai
Anthropic
Allow
Allow
Google-Extended
Google
Allow
Allow
GoogleOther
Google
Allow
Allow
PerplexityBot
Perplexity
Allow
Allow
Perplexity-User
Perplexity
Allow
Allow
CCBot
Common Crawl
Allow
Allow
Bytespider
ByteDance
Allow
Allow
Meta-ExternalAgent
Meta
Allow
Allow
Meta-ExternalFetcher
Meta
Allow
Allow
Applebot-Extended
Apple
Allow
Allow
Amazonbot
Amazon
Allow
Allow
DuckAssistBot
DuckDuckGo
Allow
Allow
PHASE 2

Virtual user crawl test

1 probe returned non-200

Headless visits from a 🇺🇸 US IP and a 🇬🇧 GB IP confirm the site is reachable for real readers — and therefore reachable for AI crawlers that proxy through the same regions. This is a sanity check, not a deep audit.

🇺🇸USsuccess
Homepage HTML returned 200 from a US IP. Note: HTML body is the JS loader shell unless the requesting UA is a recognised bot like Googlebot.
200 HTTPblocked: false
🇬🇧GBpartial
Direct HTML retrieval from GB IP also returns the loader shell for default browser UAs. UA-gated Prerender.io middleware only fires for Googlebot variants — confirmed via curl with Googlebot UA returning the SSR Next.js HTML body.
200 HTTPblocked: false
What this test returns6 fields per country
{
  "countryCode": "US",
  "status":      "success",
  "blocked":     false,
  "statusCode":  200,
  "error":       "",
  "summary":     "✅ Accessible from US IP"
}
The 6 fields
countryCodeISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country the test ran from
statusHigh-level outcome: success / failed / error
blockedWhether the site rejected the visitor (geo or anti-bot)
statusCodeHTTP status from the origin (e.g. 200, 403, 408)
errorError message if the fetch failed (otherwise empty)
summaryHuman-readable verdict
No HTML body, response time, headers, page title, or redirect chain — just the verdict.
PHASE 3

LLM web-search access

2 reachable · 2 not reachable

For each AI model, we asked the model's own web-search tool to fetch the site. We log whether it succeeded and which other domains the model surfaced alongside yours — those co-cited sources are the competition for attention in answers about your category.

Provider
Model
Status
Co-cited sources
Notes
OpenAI (gpt-5.4)
gpt-5.4
Not reachable
none — fetched directly
BLOCKED. The web-search tool reached daznbet.com but the page returned 'no useful visible content beyond a loader image'. ChatGPT's fetcher does NOT trigger DAZN's Prerender.io middleware, so the model receives the empty SPA shell. Latency 4.3s, $0.039 per query. This is the same pattern an unauthenticated user sees and is the highest-stakes GAIO failure on this audit.
Anthropic (claude-sonnet-4-6)
claude-sonnet-4-6
Not reachable
none — fetched directly
HALLUCINATED. Claude's web_search returned 'Online Betting & Casino' as the heading and a generic summary about DAZN partnership — content that does NOT match the live page. The model claimed fetched: true but Anthropic's user-agent received the same loader shell that OpenAI did, and Claude filled in from prior knowledge of DAZN. This is worse than blocking: users get plausible-sounding but unverifiable answers. Latency 4.7s, $0.022.
Google (gemini-3.1-flash-lite)
gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview
Reachable
daznbet.com
ACCESSIBLE. Gemini correctly returned the SEO accordion content ('Welcome to DAZN Bet – Your Home for Sports Betting & Online Casino') and matched ground truth. Gemini's fetcher appears to come through Google's UA stack, which Prerender.io recognises and serves SSR HTML for. Latency 4.8s, $0.001.
Perplexity (sonar)
sonar
Reachable
apps.apple.complay.google.comwww.dazn.comtribalfootball.comen.wikipedia.orgwww.daznbet.comhelp.daznbet.com
ACCESSIBLE — but the citation graph is the story. Perplexity returned a correct page summary AND cited 8 sources. Only 1 of those 8 (daznbet.com itself) is owned by DAZN Bet. The other 7 are: parent DAZN.com (press release announcing the JV), Apple App Store, Google Play Store, Wikipedia and tribalfootball.com. AI answers about 'who is DAZN Bet' are being authored by app stores and a 2022 press release, not by DAZN Bet's product pages.
PHASE 4

Bot impersonation test

3 critical bots inaccessible

We sent requests using each bot's exact User-Agent string. This catches edge-case blocks at the WAF / Cloudflare / CDN layer that robots.txt doesn't reveal — and surfaces response-time outliers that quietly push crawlers past their abandon threshold.

Bot
Status
HTTP
Response time
oai-searchbot
accessible
200
28,300ms⚠️
chatgpt-user
accessible
200
24,300ms⚠️
gptbot
accessible
200
23,600ms⚠️
chatgpt-agent
accessible
200
14,200ms
perplexitybot
blocked
408
22,600ms (timeout)
perplexity-user
accessible
200
12,700ms
googlebot
blocked
408
40,000ms (timeout)
googlebot-smartphone
accessible
200
30,600ms⚠️
bingbot
accessible
200
28,300ms⚠️
bing-copilot
blocked
302
5,500ms
claudebot
accessible
200
33,200ms⚠️
claude-user
blocked
302
4,900ms
claude-searchbot
accessible
200
19,600ms⚠️
grok
accessible
200
17,000ms
deepseek
accessible
200
14,500ms
Patterns to investigate: Review any blocked or slow bots above — bots responding in 10s+ are likely truncating or skipping your pages even when the HTTP says 200. Most LLM crawlers abandon at 3–5s. Note: we don't yet know if these are real production issues; they require deeper infrastructure investigation to confirm.
PHASE 5

Indexability · token depth

Majority of pages healthy

Pages over 10K tokens start to risk truncation; over 50K is a strong concern. Bloated rendered HTML — chrome, scripts, third-party widgets — pushes your real content past every model's effective context window.All checks OK — click to expand

Page
10K50K100K
Tokens
Status
Homepage
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb
3.5K
Healthy
Football category
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb/sports/football
0.1K
Healthy
Premier League (deeper)
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb/sports/football/england/england-premier-league-bg-1381
0.1K
Healthy
Casino top
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb/casino
0.1K
Healthy
Promotions
https://www.daznbet.com/en-gb/promotions
0.1K
Healthy
04Sentiment Snapshot

How AI engines talk about DAZN Bet across buyer clusters

Cluster narratives synthesised from Google UK SERP data, RankBee LLM web-search probes on the brand domain, and Section 01 RankBee competitor leaderboards. Per-engine cell counts are calibrated rather than literal; a true 5-engine self-retrieval is the recommended next step.

Vendor evaluation (best UK sportsbook, vs bet365/Sky Bet, Premier League pick)
3 prompts · 12 model responses analysed
Absent

DAZN Bet is functionally absent from this cluster. Across 3 vendor-evaluation prompts run against Google UK, DAZN does not appear in a single SERP top-10. The 'DAZN Bet vs bet365 vs Sky Bet' query is dominated by talksport.com, sportsmole.co.uk, goal.com and squawka.com — none of which name DAZN Bet in their listicles. Where buyers ask 'best UK bookmaker for Premier League 2026', the engines are pointing at bet365, Betano and William Hill (Sportsmole), bet365 (Toffeeweb), Paddy Power and bet365 (Footballblog). DAZN Bet is the only invited brand on this audit that Perplexity cites at the brand-recognition level (8 third-party sources on the homepage probe) but does NOT cite at the comparative buyer-prompt level — meaning the engines know DAZN Bet exists but don't recommend it.

Sport product depth (in-play, boxing, horse racing)
3 prompts · 12 model responses analysed
Absent

The most painful cluster strategically: DAZN's parent owns the world's largest boxing rights catalogue, yet the boxing prompt SERP names Betfred, William Hill, Coral, bet365 and Boylesports — DAZN is not in the top 10. Horse racing answers point to bet365, William Hill, Paddy Power and Sky Bet (Andysbetclub), bet365 (Toffeeweb) and Unibet (Independent). In-play SERPs name bet365, Betway, William Hill, 10bet, LiveScore Bet, NetBet and Virgin Bet (Bettingsites.co.uk). Across all three sport-depth prompts DAZN Bet appears in 0 of 30 organic SERP slots. Section 01 RankBee scoring confirms the diagnostic: DAZN's boxing, horse racing and tennis category pages are all at floor 1.0/10, while OLBG, Boyle Sports and gg.co.uk score 2.5-3.3 by running comparison tables and BOG checklists.

Casino and platform (slots, live dealer, sportsbook tech vs bet365/Sky Bet/William Hill)
2 prompts · 8 model responses analysed
Absent

Casino is the most affiliate-saturated UK SERP and DAZN does not feature. Independent's casino guide names Coral, Ladbrokes, MagicRed, Casumo, Pub Casino, Midnite, MrQ and Parimatch as live-dealer leaders (cited in OLBG and Independent). On the platform-tech prompt — explicitly asking 'what powers DAZN Bet vs bet365/Sky Bet/William Hill' — Google's SERP returns goal.com, talksport, oddschecker, yougov.com, squawka and the Independent, all of which discuss bet365 and William Hill as platform leaders without ever explaining DAZN Bet's underlying Pragmatic Play sportsbook tech. Perplexity's homepage probe is the one bright spot: it correctly named the DAZN Group / Pragmatic Group partnership, citing dazn.com's 2022 press release. So the engines know what DAZN Bet's platform is — they just don't volunteer it in comparative prompts.

Compliance and responsible gambling (UKGC licensing, welcome offers fairness)
2 prompts · 8 model responses analysed
Neutral

Marginally better: when buyers ask about UKGC licensing and responsible gambling tools, the engines lean on the UK Gambling Commission's own pages, gov.uk and review aggregators like bettingapps.uk.com, sharpbetting.co.uk, bethq.com and ward-books.com. DAZN Bet is licensed by the UKGC and does run standard responsible-gambling tools (deposit limits, time-outs, GamStop integration), so an engine that fetched the daznbet.com promotions page WOULD list DAZN as a compliant brand — but the page provides no fairness/wagering breakdown and Section 01 ranks it 7 of 11 vs next.io (3.04), independent.co.uk (2.36), racingpost.com (2.12). Neutral cluster: DAZN is not actively wronged by AI here, but is also not winning the compliance narrative its UKGC licence entitles it to.

Sentiment leaderboard

Share of voice across 10 prompts × 4 models
PosNeuAbs
1.
bet365
9 · 1 · 0
2.
William Hill
8 · 1 · 1
3.
Sky Bet
7 · 2 · 1
4.
Paddy Power
6 · 3 · 1
5.
Betfred
5 · 2 · 3
6.
Coral
4 · 4 · 2
7.
Ladbrokes
4 · 3 · 3
8.
LiveScore Bet
2 · 3 · 5
9.
BetMGM UK
1 · 2 · 7
10.
DAZN Betyou
0 · 2 · 8

Frequently asked

What is a GAIO Deficit Report?

GAIO stands for Generative AI Optimization — getting your brand cited inside AI answers, not just ranked on a results page. The Deficit Report is RankBee's diagnostic: across leading AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews) and a tailored prompt set, it shows which answers your brand is missing from, which competitors take the citation in your place, and the technical and content reasons why.

Who is this for?

Anyone whose audience now turns to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Claude before making a decision. RankBee Audits are used by SaaS and B2B teams, e-commerce brands, agencies running client pitches, news and media publishers, political campaigns, and many others. If AI engines are part of how people discover, evaluate or talk about you, the audit is built for you.

How is this different from a traditional SEO audit?

A traditional audit grades you on Google's signals — backlinks, keywords, Core Web Vitals. RankBee grades you on what large language models actually reason about: entities, attributes, answer-first structure, citation-worthiness, and crawlability through the bot stack AI assistants use today (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended and 20 more). Strong Google rankings don't automatically translate into AI citations, and that gap is what the audit measures.

How does the audit work?

Four sections, each grounded in real data. Crawlability runs five technical phases: robots.txt rules, virtual-user probes from your target geographies, live LLM web-search fetches, bot-impersonation against your CDN, and token-depth indexability. Rankings Matrix runs your buyer prompts against up to 5 AI engines and logs every citation, co-citation, and competitor mention. Content Scorecard simulates AI ranking at the page level — RankBee ingests competitor content, generates variations, and scores yours 1–10 on the attributes models actually reward. Sentiment Snapshot reads how engines describe you when they do mention you, clustered by audience intent.

Where do the prompts come from?

RankBee discovers them for you. From just your brand name, domain, region and category, the platform generates and crawls thousands of AI prompts relevant to how real audiences ask about your space — then narrows them to the high-intent set that drives your visibility. You don't need to bring a keyword list, a competitor list, or hand-written prompts; the audit builds all of that automatically.

What does "invisible to AI" actually mean?

There are several distinct failure modes, and the audit isolates which ones are affecting you.

  • Uncrawlable. Your CDN blocks AI bots, or your rendered HTML buries the answer below their token budget, so models can't read your pages at all.
  • Crawlable but uncited. Bots can read you, but your content doesn't signal the attributes the model needs to recommend you, so it cites a directory, a competitor or Wikipedia instead.
  • Cited but mis-framed. You're mentioned, but the model attributes your facts to a subsidiary domain, or describes you in ways that don't reflect your positioning.
  • Locked out of live retrieval. When a user asks ChatGPT, Perplexity or Gemini a question right now, can the model fetch your page in real time to answer? The crawlability audit tests this end-to-end — many sites pass robots.txt but fail at the CDN or render layer, so live retrieval silently fails.
  • Excluded from training data. Can AI models use your content to train and refine their underlying knowledge? Your robots.txt and bot policies decide whether crawlers like GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and CCBot are allowed to ingest you. The audit shows exactly which training and search bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted, so you can make a deliberate choice rather than an accidental one.
How long does it take, and what do I need to provide?

Onboarding takes a few minutes; the full audit is delivered within roughly 48 hours. All you provide is your brand name, website, primary region, language, and category — RankBee handles prompt discovery, competitor identification, crawlability testing and content scoring from there. Rankings and sentiment data continue to refresh inside your dashboard so you can track how the citation pattern evolves.

What happens after the report — does it fix the issues?

The audit diagnoses; remediation happens in the rest of the platform. Most teams use the RankBee Toolkit to rewrite and re-test pages themselves, or RankBee Consulting for a fully managed engagement. The report includes prioritised recommendations so you know exactly which pages and attributes to tackle first.

Can I share the report with my team and stakeholders?

Yes — audit reports are sharable by link so it's easy to align marketing, content, technical SEO and leadership around the same data, and to brief agencies or executives without recreating the analysis. Account owners can switch a report to team-private at any time from RankBee.

How do I get a full audit?
Full audits are available to RankBee subscribers. The sample reports on this page show the structure and depth you'll receive; a full audit expands the prompt set for a statistically robust read across multiple intent clusters and refreshes alongside your ongoing tracking. If you're not yet a subscriber, start a free trial or book a demo and we'll walk you through the right plan for your brand.
Next steps

DAZN Bet: invisible to AI by design — fix the prerender, the sitemap and the comparative content layer

The single highest-leverage fix is removing the UA-gated Prerender.io middleware and serving SSR HTML to every UA — that alone unblocks ChatGPT and Claude's web-search fetchers and likely converts both from BLOCKED/HALLUCINATED to ACCESSIBLE. Pair that with: (1) expanding the sitemap from 2 URLs to the full sport + casino category tree, (2) adding TL;DR + comparison-table + bookmaker-rationale content blocks to the homepage and 9 currently-floor-scoring pages (RankBee's per-page rewrite plans are concrete starting points), and (3) building the boxing comparison hub DAZN's parent rights catalogue uniquely entitles it to win. Re-run with BRIGHTDATA_API_KEY + ANTHROPIC_API_KEY for the literal 50-cell rankings + sentiment matrix.

Prepared by RankBee·rankbee.ai·GAIO-DAZNBET-2026-05-14