Four sections covering technical access, AI visibility, content, and reputation.
This is more than a crawl audit. We measure where your buyers go to find you, what AI says when they ask, and what's missing from your story.
RankBee scores Boomer's homepage, promotions, app, locations, and payments pages against the URLs AI engines are already citing for Nevada-sportsbook queries. Raw 1-10 scores; 4 of 5 pages are bottom-half versus editorial roundups.
Real 50-cell self-retrieval on 2026-05-14 across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews on 10 buyer prompts. Boomer's lands 14 of 50 cells (28%) — rank 5 of 8 — behind Caesars, Circa, Westgate, and BetMGM Nevada.
Robots.txt is fully open, virtual-user probes pass, 15 of 15 impersonated bots return 200 OK, and 4 of 4 LLM web-search providers fetch the live homepage with matching content. This is a near-perfect crawl audit.
Boomer's was recommended (3+ engines) on 3 of 10 prompts, mentioned on 2, and absent on 5. The biggest gap is the Promotions & bonuses cluster — zero engines surfaced Boomer's on either promo prompt, while BetMGM has two of its own URLs in the top 8 cited domains.
Content scorecard — 5 strategic pages
Each Boomer's URL is scored on a raw 1-10 scale by RankBee's score_content workflow against the live URLs AI engines are already citing for the same Nevada-sportsbook queries. Average Boomer's score across the 5 pages is 1.28/10; the leader band is 1.89-2.40/10. The leaders are...
Content quality leaderboard
iRanking matrix — 10 buyer prompts × 5 AI engines
Live 50-cell run on 2026-05-14: 10 prompts dispatched to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews via Bright Data dataset snapshots (country=US), plus Claude Sonnet 4.5 with web search via the Anthropic API. Cells mark whether each engine surfaced the brand in answer...
AI Coverage Leaderboard
iCrawlability and live-fetch access
RankBee tested betwithboomer.com across five phases on 2026-05-14: robots.txt directives, US virtual-user probe, LLM web-search fetch, 15-bot impersonation matrix, and per-page indexability. Every phase returned green.
How AI engines talk about Boomer's
We grouped 10 real buyer questions into four topics and asked every major AI engine. Here's what they said — and where Boomer's is winning, mentioned, or missing entirely.
Sentiment leaderboard
Frequently asked
What is a GAIO Deficit Report?
GAIO stands for Generative AI Optimization — getting your brand cited inside AI answers, not just ranked on a results page. The Deficit Report is RankBee's diagnostic: across leading AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews) and a tailored prompt set, it shows which answers your brand is missing from, which competitors take the citation in your place, and the technical and content reasons why.
Who is this for?
Anyone whose audience now turns to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Claude before making a decision. RankBee Audits are used by SaaS and B2B teams, e-commerce brands, agencies running client pitches, news and media publishers, political campaigns, and many others. If AI engines are part of how people discover, evaluate or talk about you, the audit is built for you.
How is this different from a traditional SEO audit?
A traditional audit grades you on Google's signals — backlinks, keywords, Core Web Vitals. RankBee grades you on what large language models actually reason about: entities, attributes, answer-first structure, citation-worthiness, and crawlability through the bot stack AI assistants use today (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended and 20 more). Strong Google rankings don't automatically translate into AI citations, and that gap is what the audit measures.
How does the audit work?
Four sections, each grounded in real data. Crawlability runs five technical phases: robots.txt rules, virtual-user probes from your target geographies, live LLM web-search fetches, bot-impersonation against your CDN, and token-depth indexability. Rankings Matrix runs your buyer prompts against up to 5 AI engines and logs every citation, co-citation, and competitor mention. Content Scorecard simulates AI ranking at the page level — RankBee ingests competitor content, generates variations, and scores yours 1–10 on the attributes models actually reward. Sentiment Snapshot reads how engines describe you when they do mention you, clustered by audience intent.
Where do the prompts come from?
RankBee discovers them for you. From just your brand name, domain, region and category, the platform generates and crawls thousands of AI prompts relevant to how real audiences ask about your space — then narrows them to the high-intent set that drives your visibility. You don't need to bring a keyword list, a competitor list, or hand-written prompts; the audit builds all of that automatically.
What does "invisible to AI" actually mean?
There are several distinct failure modes, and the audit isolates which ones are affecting you.
- Uncrawlable. Your CDN blocks AI bots, or your rendered HTML buries the answer below their token budget, so models can't read your pages at all.
- Crawlable but uncited. Bots can read you, but your content doesn't signal the attributes the model needs to recommend you, so it cites a directory, a competitor or Wikipedia instead.
- Cited but mis-framed. You're mentioned, but the model attributes your facts to a subsidiary domain, or describes you in ways that don't reflect your positioning.
- Locked out of live retrieval. When a user asks ChatGPT, Perplexity or Gemini a question right now, can the model fetch your page in real time to answer? The crawlability audit tests this end-to-end — many sites pass robots.txt but fail at the CDN or render layer, so live retrieval silently fails.
- Excluded from training data. Can AI models use your content to train and refine their underlying knowledge? Your robots.txt and bot policies decide whether crawlers like GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and CCBot are allowed to ingest you. The audit shows exactly which training and search bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted, so you can make a deliberate choice rather than an accidental one.
How long does it take, and what do I need to provide?
Onboarding takes a few minutes; the full audit is delivered within roughly 48 hours. All you provide is your brand name, website, primary region, language, and category — RankBee handles prompt discovery, competitor identification, crawlability testing and content scoring from there. Rankings and sentiment data continue to refresh inside your dashboard so you can track how the citation pattern evolves.
What happens after the report — does it fix the issues?
The audit diagnoses; remediation happens in the rest of the platform. Most teams use the RankBee Toolkit to rewrite and re-test pages themselves, or RankBee Consulting for a fully managed engagement. The report includes prioritised recommendations so you know exactly which pages and attributes to tackle first.
Can I share the report with my team and stakeholders?
Yes — audit reports are sharable by link so it's easy to align marketing, content, technical SEO and leadership around the same data, and to brief agencies or executives without recreating the analysis. Account owners can switch a report to team-private at any time from RankBee.
How do I get a full audit?
Perfect access, rank 5 of 8 — and a zero-citation promo cluster
The crawl audit is the cleanest we have seen for a 2025-launch brand and the branded-query coverage is already strong — ChatGPT cited 7 owned URLs on the payments prompt and Claude cited 9 owned URLs on the locations prompt. Three priorities emerge from the 50-cell run: (1) close the Promotions cluster — zero owned URLs were cited across both promo prompts while BetMGM has two of its own URLs in the top 8 cited domains, so pitch the $250 offer into SportsbookReview, PlayNevada, OddsJam, VegasInsider's bonus hubs AND deepen /first-deposit-match/; (2) win P3 (best app for NFL) and P9 (how to sign up in Nevada) — both prompts are currently absent on all 5 engines; (3) push Boomer's into the editorial roundups that engines already cite for Nevada vendor evaluation (TheSportsGeek, Covers, Vegas-Aces, SportsGamblingPodcast).