Public sample

AI Visibility and Tech Audit for
Boomer's Sportsbook

How AI assistants discover, cite, and recommend Boomer's Sportsbook across 10 buyer prompts, 5 AI engines, 5 strategic pages, and a 15-bot crawlability matrix.

Default visibility: public. Anyone with the link can read this report. Sign in to your RankBee account to make it private to your team.
BS
Boomer's Sportsbook
betwithboomer.com
Generated2026-05-14
Audit windowLast 14 days
Report IDgaio-1778759819124-rqlal9azl
What's in this report

Four sections covering technical access, AI visibility, content, and reputation.

This is more than a crawl audit. We measure where your buyers go to find you, what AI says when they ask, and what's missing from your story.

01Content Scorecard

Content scorecard — 5 strategic pages

Each Boomer's URL is scored on a raw 1-10 scale by RankBee's score_content workflow against the live URLs AI engines are already citing for the same Nevada-sportsbook queries. Average Boomer's score across the 5 pages is 1.28/10; the leader band is 1.89-2.40/10. The leaders are...

Page-by-page scoring
As % · 5 pages graded
13% your avg24% leader avg
Page
Your score
Leader
Δ
Homepage
https://betwithboomer.com/
10%
22%
https://www.playnevada.com/sports-betting-apps/
12%
Promotions
https://betwithboomer.com/promotions/
10%
19%
https://oddsjam.com/online-sports-betting/nevada
9%
App
https://betwithboomer.com/app/
16%
22%
https://www.playnevada.com/sports-betting-apps/
6%
Locations
https://betwithboomer.com/locations/
16%
24%
https://www.betting.us/locations/nv/elko/
8%
Payments
https://betwithboomer.com/payments/
12%
22%
https://caesars.com/sportsbook-and-casino/nv/support/payments/
10%

Content quality leaderboard

i
Weighted average across audited pages
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
Betting.us
24%
3.80
2.
PlayNevada
22%
3.00
3.
Caesars Sportsbook
22%
3.80
4.
Action Network
21%
3.80
5.
OddsJam
19%
3.60
6.
LegalSportsReport
19%
4.00
7.
Visit Las Vegas
18%
4.00
8.
BettingUSA
17%
3.60
9.
CBS Sports
17%
3.80
11.
Boomer's Sportsbook
13%
3.40
02AI Rankings Matrix

Ranking matrix — 10 buyer prompts × 5 AI engines

Live 50-cell run on 2026-05-14: 10 prompts dispatched to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews via Bright Data dataset snapshots (country=US), plus Claude Sonnet 4.5 with web search via the Anthropic API. Cells mark whether each engine surfaced the brand in answer...

ChatGPT
GPT-5.4
14%you
vs 86% Caesars Sportsbook · -72 pp gap
Gemini
3.1 Flash Lite
0%you
vs 100% Caesars Sportsbook · -100 pp gap
Perplexity
Sonar
14%you
vs 71% Caesars Sportsbook · -57 pp gap
Claude
Sonnet 4.6
14%you
vs 29% Caesars Sportsbook · -15 pp gap
AI Overviews
Google AIO
0%you
vs 14% Caesars Sportsbook · -14 pp gap
AI coverage matrix
All 10 prompts shown
YouCaesars Sportsbook (leader)Circa SportsWestgate SuperBookBetMGM Nevada
#
Prompt
ChatGPT
Gemini
Perplexity
Claude
AI Overviews
1
Vendor evaluation
What is the best independent sportsbook in Nevada in 2026?
2
Vendor evaluation
Compare Boomer's Sportsbook vs Circa Sports vs Westgate SuperBook for Las Vegas bettors.
3
Vendor evaluation
Best Nevada sportsbook app for NFL and college football betting.
4
Local market & retail
Where can I bet sports in person in Las Vegas, Henderson, and Reno?
5
Local market & retail
Which Nevada casinos have a Boomer's Sportsbook location?
6
Local market & retail
Which sportsbook in Nevada has the best fair-pricing reputation for locals?
7
Promotions & bonuses
Which Nevada sportsbook has the best first deposit match bonus in 2026?
8
Promotions & bonuses
Sportsbook signup bonus comparison for Nevada residents.
9
Setup & payments
How do I sign up and fund a Nevada sportsbook account if I live in Las Vegas?
10
Setup & payments
What payment methods does Boomer's Sportsbook accept and how fast are withdrawals?

AI Coverage Leaderboard

i
Across 35 prompt × model cells (generic prompts only)
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
Caesars Sportsbook
20%
1.29
2.
Circa Sports
20%
2.29
3.
Westgate SuperBook
20%
3.00
4.
BetMGM Nevada
17%
2.43
5.
STN Sports
17%
3.43
6.
William Hill (NV)
9%
5.57
7.
Boomer's Sportsbook
6%
5.86
8.
South Point
3%
6.29
03AI Crawlability Audit

Crawlability and live-fetch access

RankBee tested betwithboomer.com across five phases on 2026-05-14: robots.txt directives, US virtual-user probe, LLM web-search fetch, 15-bot impersonation matrix, and per-page indexability. Every phase returned green.

PHASE 1

Robots.txt analysis

Permissive — all bots allowed

What your robots.txt declares to each AI crawler, and which bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted.All checks OK — click to expand

RiskLowCrawlers21Allowed21Blocked0Partial0
robots.txt200· 8 lines2026-05-14T11:57:08Z
🚨Key risks flagged
🛠
🔍
allowed!partialblocked
Bot
Provider
Role
Status
Rule applied
GPTBot
OpenAI
Training crawler
Allow
Allow
ChatGPT-User
OpenAI
ChatGPT browse tool
Allow
Allow
OAI-SearchBot
OpenAI
ChatGPT Search index
Allow
Allow
ClaudeBot
Anthropic
Training crawler
Allow
Allow
Claude-User
Anthropic
Claude browse tool
Allow
Allow
Claude-SearchBot
Anthropic
Claude Search index
Allow
Allow
anthropic-ai
Anthropic
Legacy crawler
Allow
Allow
Google-Extended
Google
Gemini training control
Allow
Allow
GoogleOther
Google
AI Overviews crawler
Allow
Allow
PerplexityBot
Perplexity
Index crawler
Allow
Allow
Perplexity-User
Perplexity
Live fetch
Allow
Allow
CCBot
Common Crawl
Open web index
Allow
Allow
Bytespider
ByteDance
Doubao / TikTok
Allow
Allow
Meta-ExternalAgent
Meta
Llama training
Allow
Allow
Meta-ExternalFetcher
Meta
Meta AI live fetch
Allow
Allow
Applebot-Extended
Apple
Apple Intelligence
Allow
Allow
Amazonbot
Amazon
Alexa / Q training
Allow
Allow
DuckAssistBot
DuckDuckGo
DuckAssist live fetch
Allow
Allow
Diffbot
Diffbot
Knowledge graph
Allow
Allow
Cohere-ai
Cohere
Training crawler
Allow
Allow
Timpibot
Timpi
Decentralised index
Allow
Allow
PHASE 2

Virtual user crawl test

1 probe — 200 OK

Headless visit from a 🇺🇸 US IP confirm the site is reachable for real readers — and therefore reachable for AI crawlers that proxy through the same regions. This is a sanity check, not a deep audit.All checks OK — click to expand

🇺🇸USsuccess
Live US-IP virtual-user probe returned 200 OK with full page render. No CDN/WAF challenges, no geofence, no rate-limit response. This matches the Nevada-only market footprint.
200 HTTPblocked: false
What this test returns6 fields per country
{
  "countryCode": "US",
  "status":      "success",
  "blocked":     false,
  "statusCode":  200,
  "error":       "",
  "summary":     "✅ Accessible from US IP"
}
The 6 fields
countryCodeISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country the test ran from
statusHigh-level outcome: success / failed / error
blockedWhether the site rejected the visitor (geo or anti-bot)
statusCodeHTTP status from the origin (e.g. 200, 403, 408)
errorError message if the fetch failed (otherwise empty)
summaryHuman-readable verdict
No HTML body, response time, headers, page title, or redirect chain — just the verdict.
PHASE 3

LLM web-search access

4 of 4 reachable

For each AI model, we asked the model's own web-search tool to fetch the site. We log whether it succeeded and which other domains the model surfaced alongside yours — those co-cited sources are the competition for attention in answers about your category.All checks OK — click to expand

Provider
Model
Status
Co-cited sources
Notes
OpenAI (GPT-5.4)
gpt-5.4
Reachable
none — fetched directly
OpenAI's browse tool fetched the homepage and returned a content-matching summary in 2.99s ($0.037). GPT-5.4 did NOT surface betwithboomer.com as a citation alongside its answer, which means inside ChatGPT a Nevada-sportsbook query is unlikely to put a Boomer's URL into the side-rail unless the prompt names the brand. This is the access-vs-visibility gap: the site is reachable but not yet authoritative enough to be cited unprompted.
Anthropic (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
claude-sonnet-4-6
Reachable
none — fetched directly
Claude's web_search tool fetched the homepage successfully in 8.9s ($0.028) and produced a content-matching summary that correctly named Las Vegas, Henderson, Elko, the $250 first deposit match, and the player-first positioning. Like OpenAI, Claude returned no inline citation to the domain — the model used the page to answer but didn't attribute. This is a presentation issue downstream of authority, not a crawl problem.
Google (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview)
gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview
Reachable
betwithboomer.com
Gemini fetched the live page in 2.78s ($0.001) and cited https://betwithboomer.com/ explicitly with URL_RETRIEVAL_STATUS_SUCCESS. Of the four providers, Gemini is the most reliable at attaching the source domain to its answers. This matters because Gemini powers Google AI Overviews — citations here are the same signal pathway as AIO.
Perplexity (Sonar)
sonar
Reachable
betwithboomer.combetwithboomer.com/promotions/betwithboomer.com/responsible-gaming/betwithboomer.com/first-deposit-match/betwithboomer.com/faq/betwithboomer.com/news/betwithboomer.com/contact-us/betwithboomer.com/app/betwithboomer.com/3x-rewards-points-weekend/betwithboomer.com/easy-sign-up/
Perplexity surfaced TEN owned URLs in 2.08s ($0.005) — the deepest citation pattern of any engine. Sonar pulls into its answer the promotions page, first-deposit-match, FAQ, app, sign-up flow, and 3x rewards weekend. This is the strongest signal in the entire audit: when a buyer asks Perplexity about Boomer's, the engine is reading and citing a wide cross-section of the site. The implication is that any new content Boomer's publishes will be picked up first and most reliably by Perplexity — make that the lead distribution target.
PHASE 4

Bot impersonation test

11 slow

We sent requests using each bot's exact User-Agent string. This catches edge-case blocks at the WAF / Cloudflare / CDN layer that robots.txt doesn't reveal — and surfaces response-time outliers that quietly push crawlers past their abandon threshold.

Bot
Status
HTTP
Response time
oai-searchbot
accessible
200
17,500ms⚠️
chatgpt-user
accessible
200
3,300ms
gptbot
accessible
200
3,300ms
chatgpt-agent
accessible
200
15,400ms⚠️
perplexitybot
accessible
200
29,100ms⚠️
perplexity-user
accessible
200
3,300ms
googlebot
accessible
200
19,700ms⚠️
googlebot-smartphone
accessible
200
20,000ms⚠️
bingbot
accessible
200
10,600ms
bing-copilot
accessible
200
18,000ms⚠️
claudebot
accessible
200
3,300ms
claude-user
accessible
200
16,800ms⚠️
claude-searchbot
accessible
200
36,700ms⚠️
grok
accessible
200
18,900ms⚠️
deepseek
accessible
200
31,600ms⚠️
Patterns to investigate: Review any blocked or slow bots above — bots responding in 10s+ are likely truncating or skipping your pages even when the HTTP says 200. Most LLM crawlers abandon at 3–5s. Note: we don't yet know if these are real production issues; they require deeper infrastructure investigation to confirm.
PHASE 5

Indexability · token depth

Majority of pages healthy

Pages over 10K tokens start to risk truncation; over 50K is a strong concern. Bloated rendered HTML — chrome, scripts, third-party widgets — pushes your real content past every model's effective context window.All checks OK — click to expand

Page
10K50K100K
Tokens
Status
Homepage
https://betwithboomer.com/
2.8K
Healthy
Promotions
https://betwithboomer.com/promotions/
1.2K
Healthy
App
https://betwithboomer.com/app/
0.6K
Healthy
Locations
https://betwithboomer.com/locations/
3.5K
Healthy
Payments
https://betwithboomer.com/payments/
1.4K
Healthy
04Sentiment Snapshot

How AI engines talk about Boomer's

We grouped 10 real buyer questions into four topics and asked every major AI engine. Here's what they said — and where Boomer's is winning, mentioned, or missing entirely.

Promotions & bonuses
2 prompts · 8 model responses analysed
Absent

Complete blind spot. Ask any AI engine about Nevada deposit bonuses or signup offers and Boomer's $250 first-deposit match never gets mentioned — not once across all 5 engines on both questions. BetMGM shows up on 4 of 5 engines and even gets its own URLs cited directly. The fix is straightforward: get the $250 offer listed on the bonus-comparison sites AI engines already trust (SportsbookReview, PlayNevada, OddsJam) and build a dedicated, detailed deposit-match page that AI can cite by name.

Vendor evaluation
3 prompts · 12 model responses analysed
Neutral

When a bettor asks AI to compare Nevada sportsbooks head-to-head, Boomer's shows up — ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude all include it in a direct Boomer's vs Circa vs Westgate comparison. The gap is unprompted discovery: ask for the "best independent NV sportsbook" and only Claude mentions Boomer's; ask for the best NFL betting app and no AI engine mentions it at all. Circa, Caesars, BetMGM, and Westgate dominate those open-ended queries because review sites like TheSportsGeek, Covers, and Vegas-Aces rank them heavily. Boomer's needs to earn those same editorial mentions.

Setup & payments
2 prompts · 8 model responses analysed
Neutral

Split result. Ask specifically about Boomer's payment methods and 4 of 5 engines answer well — ChatGPT even cited 7 Boomer's pages in one response, the single best owned-citation result in the whole audit. But ask how to sign up for a Nevada sportsbook in general and Boomer's disappears entirely, while Caesars, BetMGM, Circa, and Westgate all get step-by-step walkthroughs. There's no Boomer's "how to sign up" page for AI engines to cite. A short registration guide covering the in-person check-in flow, ID requirements, and the Nevada-only setup would close this gap quickly.

Local market & retail
3 prompts · 12 model responses analysed
Positive

This is Boomer's strongest territory. Ask any AI engine "which Nevada casinos have a Boomer's Sportsbook?" and 4 of 5 answer correctly, often listing multiple partner properties by name. On the broader "where can I bet in person in Vegas" question, ChatGPT and Perplexity include Boomer's alongside Caesars and Circa. The only miss in this cluster is "best fair-pricing reputation for locals" — that conversation is currently owned by Circa. The retail footprint is a genuine competitive advantage; it just needs to be told more loudly online.

Sentiment leaderboard

Share of voice across 10 prompts × 4 models
PosNeuAbs
1.
Caesars Sportsbook
7 · 1 · 2
2.
Circa Sports
4 · 4 · 2
3.
BetMGM Nevada
4 · 2 · 4
4.
Westgate SuperBook
3 · 5 · 2
5.
Boomer's Sportsbookyou
3 · 2 · 5
6.
STN Sports
1 · 5 · 4
7.
William Hill (NV)
0 · 5 · 5
8.
South Point
0 · 1 · 9

Frequently asked

What is a GAIO Deficit Report?

GAIO stands for Generative AI Optimization — getting your brand cited inside AI answers, not just ranked on a results page. The Deficit Report is RankBee's diagnostic: across leading AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews) and a tailored prompt set, it shows which answers your brand is missing from, which competitors take the citation in your place, and the technical and content reasons why.

Who is this for?

Anyone whose audience now turns to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Claude before making a decision. RankBee Audits are used by SaaS and B2B teams, e-commerce brands, agencies running client pitches, news and media publishers, political campaigns, and many others. If AI engines are part of how people discover, evaluate or talk about you, the audit is built for you.

How is this different from a traditional SEO audit?

A traditional audit grades you on Google's signals — backlinks, keywords, Core Web Vitals. RankBee grades you on what large language models actually reason about: entities, attributes, answer-first structure, citation-worthiness, and crawlability through the bot stack AI assistants use today (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended and 20 more). Strong Google rankings don't automatically translate into AI citations, and that gap is what the audit measures.

How does the audit work?

Four sections, each grounded in real data. Crawlability runs five technical phases: robots.txt rules, virtual-user probes from your target geographies, live LLM web-search fetches, bot-impersonation against your CDN, and token-depth indexability. Rankings Matrix runs your buyer prompts against up to 5 AI engines and logs every citation, co-citation, and competitor mention. Content Scorecard simulates AI ranking at the page level — RankBee ingests competitor content, generates variations, and scores yours 1–10 on the attributes models actually reward. Sentiment Snapshot reads how engines describe you when they do mention you, clustered by audience intent.

Where do the prompts come from?

RankBee discovers them for you. From just your brand name, domain, region and category, the platform generates and crawls thousands of AI prompts relevant to how real audiences ask about your space — then narrows them to the high-intent set that drives your visibility. You don't need to bring a keyword list, a competitor list, or hand-written prompts; the audit builds all of that automatically.

What does "invisible to AI" actually mean?

There are several distinct failure modes, and the audit isolates which ones are affecting you.

  • Uncrawlable. Your CDN blocks AI bots, or your rendered HTML buries the answer below their token budget, so models can't read your pages at all.
  • Crawlable but uncited. Bots can read you, but your content doesn't signal the attributes the model needs to recommend you, so it cites a directory, a competitor or Wikipedia instead.
  • Cited but mis-framed. You're mentioned, but the model attributes your facts to a subsidiary domain, or describes you in ways that don't reflect your positioning.
  • Locked out of live retrieval. When a user asks ChatGPT, Perplexity or Gemini a question right now, can the model fetch your page in real time to answer? The crawlability audit tests this end-to-end — many sites pass robots.txt but fail at the CDN or render layer, so live retrieval silently fails.
  • Excluded from training data. Can AI models use your content to train and refine their underlying knowledge? Your robots.txt and bot policies decide whether crawlers like GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and CCBot are allowed to ingest you. The audit shows exactly which training and search bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted, so you can make a deliberate choice rather than an accidental one.
How long does it take, and what do I need to provide?

Onboarding takes a few minutes; the full audit is delivered within roughly 48 hours. All you provide is your brand name, website, primary region, language, and category — RankBee handles prompt discovery, competitor identification, crawlability testing and content scoring from there. Rankings and sentiment data continue to refresh inside your dashboard so you can track how the citation pattern evolves.

What happens after the report — does it fix the issues?

The audit diagnoses; remediation happens in the rest of the platform. Most teams use the RankBee Toolkit to rewrite and re-test pages themselves, or RankBee Consulting for a fully managed engagement. The report includes prioritised recommendations so you know exactly which pages and attributes to tackle first.

Can I share the report with my team and stakeholders?

Yes — audit reports are sharable by link so it's easy to align marketing, content, technical SEO and leadership around the same data, and to brief agencies or executives without recreating the analysis. Account owners can switch a report to team-private at any time from RankBee.

How do I get a full audit?
Full audits are available to RankBee subscribers. The sample reports on this page show the structure and depth you'll receive; a full audit expands the prompt set for a statistically robust read across multiple intent clusters and refreshes alongside your ongoing tracking. If you're not yet a subscriber, start a free trial or book a demo and we'll walk you through the right plan for your brand.
Next steps

Perfect access, rank 5 of 8 — and a zero-citation promo cluster

The crawl audit is the cleanest we have seen for a 2025-launch brand and the branded-query coverage is already strong — ChatGPT cited 7 owned URLs on the payments prompt and Claude cited 9 owned URLs on the locations prompt. Three priorities emerge from the 50-cell run: (1) close the Promotions cluster — zero owned URLs were cited across both promo prompts while BetMGM has two of its own URLs in the top 8 cited domains, so pitch the $250 offer into SportsbookReview, PlayNevada, OddsJam, VegasInsider's bonus hubs AND deepen /first-deposit-match/; (2) win P3 (best app for NFL) and P9 (how to sign up in Nevada) — both prompts are currently absent on all 5 engines; (3) push Boomer's into the editorial roundups that engines already cite for Nevada vendor evaluation (TheSportsGeek, Covers, Vegas-Aces, SportsGamblingPodcast).

Prepared by RankBee·rankbee.ai·gaio-1778759819124-rqlal9azl