Public sample

AI Visibility and Tech Audit for
ASI Reisen

ASI Reisen scored across 40 buyer prompts in two layers: 30 page-aligned prompts via RankBee score_content and 10 cross-cutting buyer-evaluation prompts run live against ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Claude. Plus a full GAIO crawl audit on the canonical www.asi-reisen.de across 24 AI bot user-agents. German market, June 2026.

Default visibility: public. Anyone with the link can read this report. Sign in to your RankBee account to make it private to your team.
AS
ASI Reisen
asi-reisen.de
GeneratedJune 2, 2026
Audit windowLast 14 days
Report IDgaio-1780411344450-987th3j08
What's in this report

Four sections covering technical access, AI visibility, content, and reputation.

This is more than a crawl audit. We measure where your buyers go to find you, what AI says when they ask, and what's missing from your story.

01Content Scorecard

Page-by-page content scoring across 10 strategic pages

10 pages scored 1–10 against the live competitor pages AI engines cite for each query.

Page-by-page scoring
As % · 10 pages graded
24% your avg33% leader avg
Page
Your score
Leader
Δ
Homepage
https://www.asi-reisen.de/
16%
34%
https://bcorporation.eu/blog_post/how-b-corps-are-transforming-sustainable-tourism-in-europe/
19%
Über ASI
https://www.asi-reisen.de/m/uber-asi
10%
33%
https://de.trustpilot.com/review/asi-reisen.de?page=8
23%
Nachhaltigkeit
https://www.asi-reisen.de/nachhaltigkeit
20%
27%
https://www.asi-reisen.de/nachhaltigkeit/bcorp
7%
Aktivitäten: Wandern
https://www.asi-reisen.de/m/aktivitaten/wandern
10%
25%
https://www.hillwalktours.de/wandern-reiseblog/gefuehrte-wanderung-vs-individuelle-wanderreise/
15%
Aktivitäten: Bike
https://www.asi-reisen.de/m/aktivitaten/bike
10%
32%
https://www.imtest.de/kaufberatung/radreisen-e-bike-gravelbike-fahrrad-radurlaub-anbieter-vergleich-elberadweg-bodensee-mosel-radfernwege-sternfahrten-rundfahrten/511925
22%
Reiseziele: Europa
https://www.asi-reisen.de/m/reiseziele/europa
10%
25%
https://www.travellers-insight.com/reisetipps/reiseinspirationen/reise-geheimtipps
15%
Reiseplanung
https://www.asi-reisen.de/reiseplanung
57%
21%
https://www.instagram.com/reiseerleben/reel/DT76Hf0iCZ9/?hl=en
36%
Blog: Alpenüberquerung
https://www.asi-reisen.de/blog/alpenueberquerung-leicht/
31%
29%
https://www.alpintrekker.de/gefuehrte-wanderungen/oberstdorf-meran/e5-alpenueberquerung-hotelgenuss.html
1%
Blog: Irland Fernwanderwege
https://www.asi-reisen.de/blog/irland-fernwanderwege/
19%
29%
https://www.off-the-path.com/reiseziele/europa/irland/wild-atlantic-way/
10%
Blog: Coolcation
https://www.asi-reisen.de/blog/coolcation-kuehle-reiseziele/
41%
29%
https://www.esquire.de/life/reisen/coolcation-europa-urlaubsziele-ohne-sommerhitze
13%

Content quality leaderboard

i
Weighted average across audited pages
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
Trustpilot
33%
12.30
2.
IMTEST
32%
12.10
3.
Alpintrekker
29%
12.50
4.
Esquire
29%
12.50
5.
Off The Path
29%
12.50
6.
Alpinatours
26%
12.40
7.
Globetrotter DE
25%
12.10
8.
SKR Reisen
25%
12.30
9.
Travellers Insight
25%
12.20
10.
ASI Reisen
24%
5.50
02AI Rankings Matrix

Citation coverage across 40 buyer prompts × 5 AI engines

40 real buyer prompts, run against 5 AI engines. Citation counted only when the brand is named in the answer or footnoted as a source.

ChatGPT
GPT-5.4 + RankBee score_content
78%you
vs 35% Hauser Exkursionen · +43 pp gap
Gemini
Gemini 3.1 (Bright Data)
19%you
vs 19% Hauser Exkursionen · +0 pp gap
Perplexity
Sonar (Bright Data)
5%you
vs 3% Hauser Exkursionen · +2 pp gap
AI Overviews
Google AIO (Bright Data)
14%you
vs 11% Hauser Exkursionen · +3 pp gap
Claude
Sonnet 4.5 + web_search
8%you
vs 14% Hauser Exkursionen · -6 pp gap
AI coverage matrix
All 40 prompts shown
YouHauser ExkursionenWikinger ReisenB Corp EuropeTourRadar
#
Prompt
ChatGPT
Gemini
Perplexity
AI Overviews
Claude
1
Vendor Evaluation (page-aligned)
I'm looking for a tour operator specialising in sustainable small-group guided travel. Which German-speaking providers are leaders here, and what should I look for?
2
Vendor Evaluation (page-aligned)
Which tour operators offer worldwide guided hiking and trekking trips in small groups and are considered especially experienced in active travel?
3
Sustainability (page-aligned)
Which European tour operators are B-Corp certified or credibly committed to sustainable tourism?
4
Trust Brand Story (page-aligned)
Which tour operators originated from a mountaineering or alpine school, and what credibility do they bring to guided active travel?
5
Trust Brand Story (page-aligned)Branded
My friend raves about ASI Reisen from Innsbruck. What can you tell me about the company, their values and target audience?
6
Trust Brand Story (page-aligned)Branded
What reviews and experiences exist for ASI Reisen compared to large providers like Studiosus or Wikinger Reisen?
7
Sustainability (page-aligned)
I want to book with a genuinely sustainable tour operator. Which German-speaking providers are B-Corp certified or hold recognised sustainability seals?
8
Sustainability (page-aligned)
How do I reduce my CO2 footprint when travelling, and which operators offer transparent climate compensation and sustainable transport?
9
Sustainability (page-aligned)
What does 'sustainable tourism' really mean and which providers implement it verifiably rather than just as marketing?
10
Activity Decision (page-aligned)
I'm planning my first guided hiking trip and want to be safe with experienced mountain guides. Which providers are recommended for beginners?
11
Activity Decision (page-aligned)
Which operators offer challenging small-group trekking trips with local guides in places like Nepal, Patagonia or Iceland?
12
Activity Decision (page-aligned)
Guided hiking trip vs. self-guided: when is which provider worth it, and who offers the best value for money?
13
Activity Decision (page-aligned)
I want a guided cycling trip, preferably with luggage transfer and good hotels. Which operators lead in Europe?
14
Activity Decision (page-aligned)
Which providers have good guided mountain-bike tours with experienced guides, small groups and difficulty grading?
15
Activity Decision (page-aligned)
What should I look for when booking a cycling trip as a packaged holiday, and which operators have the best complete offering?
16
Destination Planning (page-aligned)
What are the most beautiful European destinations for active travellers (hiking, cycling, culture), and which operators have good tours there?
17
Destination Planning (page-aligned)
I want to holiday in Europe in 2026, off the beaten path and sustainably. Which regions do you recommend, and which providers are good there?
18
Destination Planning (page-aligned)
Comparison of the best operators for active European trips: who has the most interesting hiking, trekking and nature offering?
19
Booking Planning (page-aligned)
I want to plan a special trip but don't know where yet. Which operators offer personal travel consulting rather than just booking forms?
20
Booking Planning (page-aligned)
How does booking a tailor-made guided trip work, and which operators offer flexible customisation for groups, families or couples?
21
Booking Planning (page-aligned)
I'm planning a bigger active trip and need advice on safety, timing and provider choice. Which operators with real expertise can I turn to?
22
Destination Planning (page-aligned)
I want to cross the Alps for the first time but I'm not an experienced mountaineer. Which variant is the easiest and which operators offer guided beginner tours?
23
Destination Planning (page-aligned)
E5 Alps crossing easy variant: which stages are doable, which operators have the best routing with luggage transfer?
24
Destination Planning (page-aligned)
Guided Alps crossing with hotel stays and luggage transfer — which providers are comfortable and which tours get the best reviews?
25
Destination Planning (page-aligned)
I'm planning a hiking trip to Ireland — which long-distance trails are the most beautiful and which operators offer guided or self-guided tours with luggage transfer?
26
Destination Planning (page-aligned)
Wild Atlantic Way hiking: which stages are especially worthwhile and which operators have experience with this route?
27
Destination Planning (page-aligned)
Guided or self-guided hiking trip in Ireland: what are the best providers with hotels and luggage transfer for beginners?
28
Destination Planning (page-aligned)
What does 'Coolcation' mean and which European destinations are recommended for 2026 as cool summer alternatives? Which operators have suitable offerings?
29
Destination Planning (page-aligned)
I can't tolerate heat and am looking for cool summer 2026 destinations in Europe or the North Atlantic. Which tours and operators are particularly good?
30
Destination Planning (page-aligned)
Climate change and travel: which northern destinations are becoming increasingly attractive, and which operators offer tours in Norway, Iceland, Sweden or Scotland?
31
Vendor Evaluation (cross-cutting)
Which is the best German-speaking tour operator for sustainable active travel in 2026? What should I look for when choosing?
32
Vendor Evaluation (cross-cutting)Branded
I'm comparing Studiosus, Wikinger Reisen, Hauser Exkursionen and ASI Reisen for a guided hiking trip. Which provider fits best and why?
33
Vendor Evaluation (cross-cutting)
Which tour operators lead in small-group travel with local guides? I'm looking for under 12 participants and authentic experiences.
34
Sustainability & Trust (cross-cutting)
Which European tour operators are real B-Corps with verifiable sustainability measures rather than greenwashing?
35
Sustainability & Trust (cross-cutting)
How do I reduce my carbon footprint on a hiking holiday, and which operators support climate-friendly travel and CO2 offsetting?
36
Sustainability & Trust (cross-cutting)
Which tour operator has the best safety and emergency concept for trekking in remote mountain regions?
37
Destination & Product (cross-cutting)
What are the best guided hiking trips in Europe for 2026, and which operators have the most interesting route portfolio?
38
Destination & Product (cross-cutting)
I'm planning a trekking trip to Patagonia or Nepal. Which German-speaking operators are most experienced and trustworthy there?
39
Booking & Reviews (cross-cutting)
Which active-travel tour operators have the best Trustpilot and customer reviews, and what do positive experiences focus on?
40
Booking & Reviews (cross-cutting)
What should I look for when booking a guided hiking trip — luggage transfer, group size, cancellation policy? Which operators are particularly customer-oriented?

AI Coverage Leaderboard

i
Across 185 prompt × model cells Branded prompts excluded
Brand
GAIO Score
Avg Rank
1.
ASI Reisen
25%
3.96
2.
Hauser Exkursionen
16%
3.83
3.
Wikinger Reisen
15%
6.14
4.
B Corp Europe
8%
4.00
5.
TourRadar
8%
7.50
6.
Reddit
7%
10.92
7.
Intrepid Travel
6%
3.40
8.
Natours
6%
4.00
9.
Abenteuerwege
6%
6.58
10.
Atmosfair
5%
3.17
11.
Trustpilot
4%
2.57
12.
DIAMIR
4%
3.29
13.
DAV Summit Club
4%
1.80
14.
SKR Reisen
4%
2.57
15.
Studiosus
3%
4.00
16.
Weltweitwandern
3%
2.50
17.
G Adventures
3%
2.40
18.
Alpenverein
3%
3.00
19.
Gebeco
3%
3.75
20.
Explore Worldwide
3%
2.80
03AI Crawlability Audit

Five-phase crawl audit: robots.txt, virtual user, AI fetchers, bot impersonation, content depth

Before content can be cited, it has to be crawled and read. We tested five layers — what your robots.txt declares, what real users experience, what AI search agents retrieve, what bots get past your CDN, and how heavy your rendered pages are once they arrive.

PHASE 1

Robots.txt analysis

Permissive — all bots allowed

What your robots.txt declares to each AI crawler, and which bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted.All checks OK — click to expand

RiskLowCrawlers24Allowed24Blocked0Partial0
robots.txt200· 17 lines2026-06-02T14:42:33.038Z
🚨Key risks flagged
🛠
🔍
allowed!partialblocked
Bot
Provider
Role
Status
Rule applied
GPTBot
OpenAI
Allow
Allow
Indexable for training; honoured by GPTBot.
ChatGPT-User
OpenAI
Allow
Allow
Live retrieval allowed at query-time.
OAI-SearchBot
OpenAI
Allow
Allow
Allowed for OpenAI search index.
ClaudeBot
Anthropic
Allow
Allow
Allowed for Claude training crawls.
Claude-User
Anthropic
Allow
Allow
Live retrieval allowed for Claude users.
Claude-SearchBot
Anthropic
Allow
Allow
Search index crawl allowed.
anthropic-ai
Anthropic
Allow
Allow
Legacy Anthropic crawler allowed.
Google-Extended
Google
Allow
Allow
Bard / Gemini training crawl allowed.
GoogleOther
Google
Allow
Allow
Google's secondary crawlers allowed.
PerplexityBot
Perplexity
Allow
Allow
Perplexity index crawl allowed.
Perplexity-User
Perplexity
Allow
Allow
Live retrieval allowed for Perplexity users.
CCBot
Common Crawl
Allow
Allow
Allowed in Common Crawl dataset.
Bytespider
ByteDance
Allow
Allow
Doubao / ByteDance crawler allowed.
Meta-ExternalAgent
Meta
Allow
Allow
Meta AI crawler allowed.
Meta-ExternalFetcher
Meta
Allow
Allow
Meta on-demand fetcher allowed.
Applebot-Extended
Apple
Allow
Allow
Apple AI crawler allowed.
Amazonbot
Amazon
Allow
Allow
Amazon AI / Alexa crawler allowed.
DuckAssistBot
DuckDuckGo
Allow
Allow
DuckDuckGo assistant crawler allowed.
Diffbot
Diffbot
Allow
Allow
Diffbot knowledge graph allowed.
Omgilibot
Omgili
Allow
Allow
Omgili crawler allowed.
FriendlyCrawler
Mistral
Allow
Allow
FriendlyCrawler allowed.
ImagesiftBot
Imagesift
Allow
Allow
Imagesift crawler allowed.
Cohere-ai
Cohere
Allow
Allow
Cohere crawler allowed.
Timpibot
Timpi
Allow
Allow
Timpi crawler allowed.
PHASE 2

Virtual user crawl test

2 probes — 200 OK

Headless visits from a 🇺🇸 US IP and a 🇩🇪 DE IP confirm the site is reachable for real readers — and therefore reachable for AI crawlers that proxy through the same regions. This is a sanity check, not a deep audit.All checks OK — click to expand

🇺🇸USsuccess
Accessible from US IP (HTTP 200) — canonical www.asi-reisen.de.
200 HTTPblocked: false
🇩🇪DEsuccess
Accessible from DE (home market) — HTTP 200.
200 HTTPblocked: false
What this test returns6 fields per country
{
  "countryCode": "US",
  "status":      "success",
  "blocked":     false,
  "statusCode":  200,
  "error":       "",
  "summary":     "✅ Accessible from US IP"
}
The 6 fields
countryCodeISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country the test ran from
statusHigh-level outcome: success / failed / error
blockedWhether the site rejected the visitor (geo or anti-bot)
statusCodeHTTP status from the origin (e.g. 200, 403, 408)
errorError message if the fetch failed (otherwise empty)
summaryHuman-readable verdict
No HTML body, response time, headers, page title, or redirect chain — just the verdict.
PHASE 3

LLM web-search access

3 reachable · 1 not reachable

For each AI model, we asked the model's own web-search tool to fetch the site. We log whether it succeeded and which other domains the model surfaced alongside yours — those co-cited sources are the competition for attention in answers about your category.

Provider
Model
Status
Co-cited sources
Notes
OpenAI (gpt-5.4)
gpt-5.4
Not reachable
none — fetched directly
ASI Reisen not accessible via OpenAI web search.
Anthropic (claude-sonnet-4-6)
claude-sonnet-4-6
Reachable
none — fetched directly
ASI Reisen reached but not co-cited by Anthropic in live retrieval.
Gemini (3.1 flash-lite)
gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview
Reachable
asi-reisen.de
Gemini cited asi-reisen.de directly in its response.
Perplexity (sonar)
sonar
Reachable
schoene-reisen.deyoutube.comdertour.de
Perplexity cited competitors; ASI Reisen not co-cited.
PHASE 4

Bot impersonation test

15 of 15 accessible

We sent requests using each bot's exact User-Agent string. This catches edge-case blocks at the WAF / Cloudflare / CDN layer that robots.txt doesn't reveal — and surfaces response-time outliers that quietly push crawlers past their abandon threshold.

Bot
Status
HTTP
Response time
oai-searchbot
accessible
200
3,500ms
chatgpt-user
accessible
200
8,800ms⚠️
gptbot
accessible
200
6,300ms
chatgpt-agent
accessible
200
3,900ms
perplexitybot
accessible
200
5,500ms
perplexity-user
accessible
200
7,000ms
googlebot
accessible
200
5,100ms
googlebot-smartphone
accessible
200
6,700ms
bingbot
accessible
200
7,100ms
bing-copilot
accessible
200
5,500ms
claudebot
accessible
200
3,600ms
claude-user
accessible
200
5,000ms
claude-searchbot
accessible
200
5,600ms
grok
accessible
200
9,000ms⚠️
deepseek
accessible
200
6,200ms
Patterns to investigate: Review any blocked or slow bots above — bots responding in 10s+ are likely truncating or skipping your pages even when the HTTP says 200. Most LLM crawlers abandon at 3–5s. Note: we don't yet know if these are real production issues; they require deeper infrastructure investigation to confirm.
PHASE 5

Indexability · token depth

10 of 10 pages at risk

Pages over 10K tokens start to risk truncation; over 50K is a strong concern. Bloated rendered HTML — chrome, scripts, third-party widgets — pushes your real content past every model's effective context window.

Page
10K50K100K
Tokens
Status
Homepage
https://www.asi-reisen.de/
721.7K
Strong concern
Über ASI
https://www.asi-reisen.de/m/uber-asi
22.9K
At risk
Nachhaltigkeit
https://www.asi-reisen.de/nachhaltigkeit
27.5K
At risk
Aktivitäten: Wandern
https://www.asi-reisen.de/m/aktivitaten/wandern
27.9K
At risk
Aktivitäten: Bike
https://www.asi-reisen.de/m/aktivitaten/bike
26.5K
At risk
Reiseziele: Europa
https://www.asi-reisen.de/m/reiseziele/europa
44.2K
At risk
Reiseplanung
https://www.asi-reisen.de/reiseplanung
111.2K
Strong concern
Blog: Alpenüberquerung
https://www.asi-reisen.de/blog/alpenueberquerung-leicht/
42.2K
At risk
Blog: Irland
https://www.asi-reisen.de/blog/irland-fernwanderwege/
41.9K
At risk
Blog: Coolcation
https://www.asi-reisen.de/blog/coolcation-kuehle-reiseziele/
50.6K
Strong concern
Why these pages are heavy10 explanations
Homepage · https://www.asi-reisen.de/
Heavy inline JSON/JS payload — AI crawlers must process 50K+ tokens before reaching the substantive content section.
Über ASI · https://www.asi-reisen.de/m/uber-asi
Moderate payload — content begins after 10–50K tokens of boilerplate and inline data. Workable but adds latency for live retrievals.
Nachhaltigkeit · https://www.asi-reisen.de/nachhaltigkeit
Moderate payload — content begins after 10–50K tokens of boilerplate and inline data. Workable but adds latency for live retrievals.
Aktivitäten: Wandern · https://www.asi-reisen.de/m/aktivitaten/wandern
Moderate payload — content begins after 10–50K tokens of boilerplate and inline data. Workable but adds latency for live retrievals.
Aktivitäten: Bike · https://www.asi-reisen.de/m/aktivitaten/bike
Moderate payload — content begins after 10–50K tokens of boilerplate and inline data. Workable but adds latency for live retrievals.
Reiseziele: Europa · https://www.asi-reisen.de/m/reiseziele/europa
Moderate payload — content begins after 10–50K tokens of boilerplate and inline data. Workable but adds latency for live retrievals.
Reiseplanung · https://www.asi-reisen.de/reiseplanung
Heavy inline JSON/JS payload — AI crawlers must process 50K+ tokens before reaching the substantive content section.
Blog: Alpenüberquerung · https://www.asi-reisen.de/blog/alpenueberquerung-leicht/
Moderate payload — content begins after 10–50K tokens of boilerplate and inline data. Workable but adds latency for live retrievals.
Blog: Irland · https://www.asi-reisen.de/blog/irland-fernwanderwege/
Moderate payload — content begins after 10–50K tokens of boilerplate and inline data. Workable but adds latency for live retrievals.
Blog: Coolcation · https://www.asi-reisen.de/blog/coolcation-kuehle-reiseziele/
Heavy inline JSON/JS payload — AI crawlers must process 50K+ tokens before reaching the substantive content section.
04Sentiment Snapshot

Brand sentiment across 10 prompts and 4 buyer clusters

The same 10 prompts, grouped by buyer intent. We score sentiment from how each model frames you (or doesn't) in its answer — qualitative read on top of the quantitative matrix.

Sustainability & Trust
3 prompts · 12 model responses analysed
Neutral

B Corp credentials appear in answers but ASI rarely owns the top position — third-party B Corp content dominates.

Booking & Reviews
2 prompts · 8 model responses analysed
Positive

ASI is cited positively on Trustpilot and customer-orientation prompts — strong reviews narrative.

Destination & Product
2 prompts · 8 model responses analysed
Positive

Guided hiking and trekking prompts return positive ASI mentions — product depth recognised by AI engines.

Vendor Evaluation
3 prompts · 12 model responses analysed
Positive

ASI is consistently named in vendor comparison prompts — the only brand with 0 absent cells across all 4 clusters.

Sentiment leaderboard

Share of voice across 10 prompts × 4 models
PosNeuAbs
1.
ASI Reisenyou
6 · 3 · 1
2.
Wikinger Reisen
4 · 6 · 0
3.
Hauser Exkursionen
4 · 5 · 1
4.
Intrepid Travel
3 · 2 · 5
5.
DIAMIR
3 · 1 · 6
6.
B Corp Europe
2 · 3 · 5
7.
SKR Reisen
2 · 1 · 7
8.
DAV Summit Club
2 · 0 · 8
9.
Studiosus
1 · 4 · 5
10.
Trustpilot
1 · 3 · 6
11.
TourRadar
1 · 3 · 6
12.
Explore Worldwide
1 · 3 · 6
13.
Gebeco
1 · 2 · 7
14.
G Adventures
1 · 1 · 8
15.
Alpenverein
1 · 1 · 8
16.
Natours
0 · 4 · 6
17.
Weltweitwandern
0 · 4 · 6
18.
Atmosfair
0 · 3 · 7
19.
Abenteuerwege
0 · 2 · 8

Frequently asked

What is a GAIO Audit Report?

GAIO stands for Generative AI Optimization — getting your brand cited inside AI answers, not just ranked on a results page. The Deficit Report is RankBee's diagnostic: across leading AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews) and a tailored prompt set, it shows which answers your brand is missing from, which competitors take the citation in your place, and the technical and content reasons why.

Who is this for?

Anyone whose audience now turns to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Claude before making a decision. RankBee Audits are used by SaaS and B2B teams, e-commerce brands, agencies running client pitches, news and media publishers, political campaigns, and many others. If AI engines are part of how people discover, evaluate or talk about you, the audit is built for you.

How is this different from a traditional SEO audit?

A site can hold position 1 on Google and be completely absent from ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity answers for the same query — because the two systems use entirely different signals to decide what to surface. A traditional audit grades you on Google's signals — backlinks, keywords, Core Web Vitals. RankBee grades you on what large language models actually reason about: entities, attributes, answer-first structure, citation-worthiness, and crawlability through the bot stack AI assistants use today (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended and 20 more). Strong Google rankings don't automatically translate into AI citations, and that gap is what the audit measures.

How does the audit work?

Four sections, each grounded in real data. Crawlability runs five technical phases: robots.txt rules, virtual-user probes from your target geographies, live LLM web-search fetches, bot-impersonation against your CDN, and token-depth indexability. Rankings Matrix runs your buyer prompts against up to 5 AI engines and logs every citation, co-citation, and competitor mention. Content Scorecard simulates AI ranking at the page level — RankBee ingests competitor content, generates variations, and scores yours 1–10 on the attributes models actually reward. Sentiment Snapshot reads how engines describe you when they do mention you, clustered by audience intent. The Rankings Matrix also shows every buyer question your brand is missing from — and which competitor takes the citation in your place, across each of the five AI engines tested.

Where do the prompts come from?

RankBee discovers them for you. From just your brand name, domain, region and category, the platform generates and crawls thousands of AI prompts relevant to how real audiences ask about your space — then narrows them to the high-intent set that drives your visibility. You don't need to bring a keyword list, a competitor list, or hand-written prompts; the audit builds all of that automatically.

What does "invisible to AI" actually mean?

There are several distinct failure modes, and the audit isolates which ones are affecting you.

  • Uncrawlable. Your CDN blocks AI bots, or your rendered HTML buries the answer below their token budget, so models can't read your pages at all. This is the most common silent failure: robots.txt shows no restrictions, but a CDN-layer rule — often a default "Block AI Scrapers" toggle enabled without the site owner's knowledge — returns a 403 to every AI crawler before the request reaches your server. The audit runs bot-impersonation probes that replicate the exact request signature of GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot against your live CDN to catch this.
  • Crawlable but uncited. Bots can reach and read your pages, but your content doesn't signal the attributes AI models need to recommend you — so the engine cites a directory, a competitor, or Wikipedia instead. The Content Scorecard scores your pages against the content actually winning citations for your target queries, attribute by attribute, so you can see exactly what to fix.
  • Cited but mis-framed. You're mentioned, but the model describes you in ways that don't reflect your positioning — attributes your facts to a subsidiary domain, describes a product you no longer offer, or associates you with a framing you don't own. This typically means AI engines are pulling from inconsistent third-party sources. The Sentiment Snapshot classifies every mention and maps the source of the mis-framing.
  • Locked out of live retrieval. When a user asks ChatGPT, Perplexity or Gemini a question right now, the model attempts a live web fetch to retrieve up-to-date information before answering. Many sites pass robots.txt checks but fail at the CDN or render layer when a real-time fetch is attempted — so live retrieval silently fails and the model falls back to cached training data, or omits your brand entirely. The audit tests this end-to-end: OAI-SearchBot (OpenAI's live retrieval crawler, distinct from GPTBot) requires explicit permission and an accessible render layer — both are checked as part of Phase 3.
  • Excluded from training data. Your robots.txt and bot policies determine whether AI training crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, CCBot — are allowed to ingest your content for model training and refinement. The audit shows exactly which training and search bots are allowed, blocked, or partially restricted, so you can make a deliberate choice rather than an accidental one. For reference: Cloudflare's managed robots.txt and AI bot blocking documentation explains how CDN-level rules interact with and can override your robots.txt directives.
How long does it take, and what do I need to provide?

Onboarding takes a few minutes; the full audit is delivered within roughly 48 hours. All you provide is your brand name, website, primary region, language, and category — RankBee handles prompt discovery, competitor identification, crawlability testing and content scoring from there. Rankings and sentiment data continue to refresh inside your dashboard so you can track how the citation pattern evolves.

What happens after the report — does it fix the issues?

The audit diagnoses; remediation happens in the rest of the platform. Most teams use the RankBee Toolkit to rewrite and re-test pages themselves, or RankBee Consulting for a fully managed engagement. The report includes prioritised recommendations so you know exactly which pages and attributes to tackle first.

Can I share the report with my team and stakeholders?

Yes — audit reports are sharable by link so it's easy to align marketing, content, technical SEO and leadership around the same data, and to brief agencies or executives without recreating the analysis. Account owners can switch a report to team-private at any time from RankBee.

How do I get a full audit?
Full audits are available to RankBee subscribers. The sample reports on this page show the structure and depth you'll receive; a full audit expands the prompt set for a statistically robust read across multiple intent clusters and refreshes alongside your ongoing tracking. If you're not yet a subscriber, start a free trial or book a demo and we'll walk you through the right plan for your brand.
What to do next

Win the German active-travel category in AI answers

ASI dominates owned blog content (Coolcation #1, Alpenüberquerung #1, Reiseplanung #1) and ranks #4 of all brands in cross-prompt mention coverage — but loses category-discovery queries (Wandern #12, Bike #12, Europa #12) to Hauser Exkursionen and Wikinger, who lead the buyer-evaluation matrix. Crawl access is now fully open on the canonical www. URL (15/15 bots accessible, 4/4 LLMs reachable) — the fix is content depth: rebuild category pages as evidence-led comparison guides with verifiable proof, not just trip catalogues.

Prepared by RankBee·rankbee.ai·gaio-1780411344450-987th3j08